Confirmation of paternity suggests a new mutation in the factor VII gene: ‘Pater certus quouque est’ ‐ Response to Girolami <i>et al</i>
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to respond to the comments made by Dr Girolami and colleagues concerning our paper describing a patient with severe factor VII deficiency (Hewitt et al, 2005). In our paper, we proposed that the severe deficiency arose from a previously undetected maternal deletion of a region of chromosome 13 (including the factor VII and factor X genes) together with a new paternal point mutation. Dr Girolami and colleagues suggested that (i) germinal mosaicism in the father and (ii) different paternity could also explain the results in our paper. Concerning the paternity, we did state in our paper that paternity was confirmed using the commercially available AmpFlSTR Identifiler polymerase chain reaction Amplification Kit (Applied Biosystems). In addition, this kit was used to verify relationships between all familial samples and rule out any possibility of sample mis-identification. However, Dr Girolami and colleagues are correct in pointing out that we did not give details of the results in our paper. In fact, the short tandem repeat (STR) analysis confirmed paternity by using 16 different STR alleles including the amelogenin allele that distinguishes between the X- and Y-chromosomes. The proband's family is Caucasian, so using the statistics supplied with the kit (for the US Caucasian population), the STR analysis had a power of discrimination of 1 in 2·00 × 1017, giving an average probability of paternity exclusion of 0·9999992. For this reason, we suggested that the g.3907G > A change represented a new paternal mutation that changes the codon for Glu29 to Lys (E29K). We agree with Dr Girolami and colleagues that the mechanism that gave rise to this mutation could be germinal mosaicism in the father. In this case, the mutation occurs postzygotically in the parent, rather than during meiosis. Germinal mosaicism has been described in many conditions including Duchenne muscular dystrophy (Bakker et al, 1987; Bunyan et al, 1994; van Essen et al, 2003), osteogenesis imperfecta (Raghunath et al, 1995) and pseudoachondroplasia (Hall et al, 1987; Ferguson et al, 1997). Typically, it is observed in dominant (and X-linked recessive) disorders, and is much less common in autosomal recessive diseases (Cserhalmi-Friedman et al, 2002). This may partially reflect ascertainment bias because of the rarity of a mating occurring between a carrier of an autosomal recessive disorder and a germline mosaic for the same disorder. We agree that germinal mosaicism indeed could be investigated by sperm analysis. In summary, because paternity was confirmed, we believe that we have identified a new mutation in the factor VII gene that may have arisen either (i) postzygotically in the father, (ii) during meiosis in the father, or (iii) postzygotically in the proband, but at such a moment and cell type that her factor VII-producing cells (liver hepatocytes) and leucocytes harbour the mutation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».