A New Pastoralism?: Nature and Community in Lyonel Trouillot’s La Belle amour humaine
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A New Pastoralism?Nature and Community in Lyonel Trouillot’s La Belle amour humaine Martin Munro For many Haitian authors, the earthquake of 2010 shook not just the physical space of Haiti but also its cultural and social foundations—indeed, everything. This idea is suggested, for example, in the title of Dany Laferrière’s first postdisaster book, Tout bouge autour de moi (Everything moves around me).1 The image the title evokes is of the author standing at the center of a still shifting world, shaken and alone. One gets the sense that he wants to resist being redirected, thrown off the singular literary and intellectual path that he has carefully shaped for himself for over a quarter of a century. He says that he had decided when sleeping out on the tennis court at the Hotel Karibe not to let the earthquake “shake up” his agenda.2 Now is not the time for tears, he says, but to “continue on our path.” He does not accept the idea of a “year zero” for the Haitian people or that the collective memory can be easily erased.3 The earthquake is part of the historical journey that stretches back to Africa. Nothing could change that journey, he says; “we continue.”4 The vocabulary and imagery he uses suggest a continued forward movement; one must continue to walk down these paths, without standing still or looking back. This contrasts to some degree with Edwidge Danticat’s idea of a radical break with the past and of the post-earthquake period as a new epoch in Haitian history. In Create Dangerously: The Immigrant Artist at Work, Danticat writes that there was to be no turning back from the moment of the earthquake, no comforting recollections of familiar places. These memories now belonged to a previous Haiti that “no longer exists, the Haiti of before the earthquake.”5 Reading Laferrière’s 2009 chronicle of return to Haiti, L’Énigme du retour, she finds it to be already like a “historical novel.” The cultural and creative stakes have also been radically changed for Danticat, as in post-earthquake Haiti the practices of reading and writing “will never be the same.” Everything has changed, including artists like herself, who find that their muse has been “irreparably altered.”6 [End Page 20] Many of the earliest post-earthquake works of Haitian writing were chronicles. For example, Laferrière’s Tout bouge autour de moi and Rodney Saint-Éloi’s Haïti, kenbe la! were attempts to record the authors’ thoughts and observations in the largely neutral style of the chronicler. There is analysis and they do offer reflections on broader issues, but formally these works remain in great part standard chronicles, recording events in a largely chronological manner; in this sense they remain faithful to the event itself. Fidelity to the truth seemed to be a primary motivation for many authors. One was left to wonder, however, what the role of fiction might be in the post-earthquake period. Does the drive for truth and the need to bear witness necessarily exclude fiction and render it a sign of vanity, a luxury almost?7 Fiction in a sense was a victim of the earthquake. One wondered at the time how long it must itself stay buried under the rubble and, when it was finally pulled free from the ruins, what condition it would be in. Would it have retained its force and vitality, or would it have to start anew, its memory either erased or forever traumatized by the event? What was the point of writing fiction after January 12, 2010? This article begins to address these questions through close analysis of Lyonel Trouillot’s first post-earthquake novel, La Belle amour humaine. This book suggests that the author agrees with Laferrière’s idea that the Haitian writer must not be diverted from his or her literary path, and that the earthquake itself does not—must not—become the primary point of reference for Haitian literature. To do so, the work implies, would be to fall into a trap, whereby the creative freedom of the author is limited and forever circumscribed by the events...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».