294 SUPERSTIMULATION IN THE FIRST FOLLICULAR WAVE, WITHOUT THE USE OF ESTRADIOL IN BONSMARA CATTLE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Protocols that control follicular wave emergence and ovulation have had a great impact on the application of commercial on-farm embryo transfer because they permit the initiation of superstimulatory treatments at a self-appointed time. However, the most common approach for the synchronization of follicular wave emergence for superstimulation involves the use of estradiol or its esters that are not commercially available in many countries. Therefore, an experiment was designed to evaluate a protocol in which the superstimulation treatment began at the time of emergence of the first follicular wave without the use of estradiol. Bonsmara donors (29 cows and 41 heifers) were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups. Donor animals in the experimental group (first wave group) received an intravaginal progesterone releasing device (Cue-Mate, Bioniche Animal Health, ON, Canada) along with PGF (0.150 mg D + cloprostenol, Bioprost-D, Biotay, Argentina) at random stages of the estrous cycle. Cue-Mates were removed 10.5 d later and a second PGF was administered at the same time, followed by GnRH (0.050 mg Lecirelina, Biosin-OV, Biotay, Argentina) 36 h later. Ovulation was expected to occur within 30 h after GnRH (day 0). On day 0 (36 h after gonadotropin-releasing hormone) donors received a new Cue-Mate, and superstimulation treatment was initiated with a total dose of 200 to 260 mg (heifers) or 320 mg (cows) NIH-FSH-P1of Folltropin-V in twice daily decreasing doses over 5 d. The PGF was administered with the last two Folltropin-V injections, and Cue-Mate devices were removed with the last Folltropin-V injection. All donors received 12.5 mg pLH (Lutropin-V, Bioniche Animal Health) 24 h after Cue-Mate removal and were AI 12 and 24 h later. Embryos were collected 7 d after pLH treatment. Donors in the Control group received a Cue-Mate and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB; Bioestradiol, Biotay) and 50 mg of progesterone (Lab. Rio de Janeiro, Argentina), and superstimulation treatments were initiated 4 d later with the same dosages used in the first wave group. The PGF administration, Cue-Mate removal, AI, and embryo collections were done as those in the first wave group. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, and results are shown in Table 1. It was not possible to pass the cervix with the collection catheter in two heifers in the control group, and they were excluded from the analysis. There were no significant effects of donor category (cows v. heifers) or treatment on superovulatory response and embryo quality (P > 0.20). In conlusion, superstimulation on a synchronized first follicular wave is as efficacious as superstimulation following synchronization of follicle wave emergence with estradiol benzoate in Bonsmara cattle. Table 1. Superovulatory response (means ± SEM) in Bonsmara cows and heifers treated with Folltropin-V during the first follicular wave or 4 d after estradiol administration Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, ON, Canada.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».