141 EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE ON EMBRYO PRODUCTION AND CONCEPTION RATES IN BEEF AND DAIRY CATTLE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of environmental temperature at the time of embryo collection and transfer on embryo quality and conception rates after transfer of fresh and frozen embryos. Purebred dairy (Holstein, Czech spotted cattle, n = 174) and beef (Charolais, Blonde d’Aquitaine, Piedmontese, Hereford, Limousin and Simmental; n = 72) donors were collected during 2005 to 2007. Donor cows received one application of PGF2a and superstimulation was initiated 9 to 11 days following estrus with pFSH (Folltropin-V; Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, ON, Canada) given twice daily for 4 days. Prostaglandin2a was given on Day 3 of the superstimulation treatment. Donors were inseminated 3 times, with 1 unit of semen on Days 5 and 6 of treatment. Embryo recovery was carried out on Day 7 after insemination. The recipients were synchronized with PGF2a and embryos were transferred on Day 7 after estrus. The effect of temperature at the time of 246 embryo recoveries and 1338 transfers (fresh and frozen embryos) was analyzed using the GLM, assuming quasi-poisson and quasi-binomial error distribution by R software (www.r-project.org). We evaluated the total number of ova/embryos collected, embryo quality, and conception rates after transfer at the environmental temperatures shown below. Temperatures were divided into the following ranges: A) from –5 to 5°C; B) from 6 to 15°C; C) from 16 to 20°C; and D) over 20°C. The average temperature values were obtained from the Czech hydrometeorological institute and corresponded to the following seasons: winter (range A and B); spring (range B and C); summer (range C and D); fall (range C and B). Dairy cows were managed intensively in barns whereas beef cows were managed in barns during the winter and on pasture from April until October. In beef donors the mean number of total ova/embryos collected and transferable embryos were 9.1 ± 7.9 and 4.2 ± 4.5, respectively and no significant effect of temperature was detected (P > 0.05). In dairy donors the mean number of total ova/embryos collected and transferable embryos were 7.9 ± 6.0 and 4.9 ± 4.5, respectively and no significant effect of temperature was detected (P = 0.27). Conception rate was greatest (P < 0.001) in temperature range D (63.64%) compared with the other temperature ranges (A = 27.66%; B = 43.65%; C = 43.21%;) in beef cows and in the range C (65.31%) than in the other temperature ranges (A = 34.7%; B = 52.67%; D = 56.25%) in dairy cows. It was concluded that temperature at the time of embryo collection did not affect embryo production and quality. However, environmental temperature did have a significant effect on conception rates in both beef and dairy recipients. Nutritional status may also have contributed to the increased conception in beef cattle during warmer temperatures. However, the optimal period for conception in dairy cows was in temperature range from 16 to 20°C, because of the potential adverse effect of heat stress in high-yielding cows. Supported by MEYS CR MSM 2678846201, LA 330; NAZV 1B44034.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».