Development of Solvent and Steam-Solvent Heavy Oil Recovery Processes Through an Integrated Program of Simulation, Laboratory Testing and Field Trials
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract ExxonMobil and its Canadian affiliate Imperial Oil Resources are pursuing an integrated research program targeted at developing the next generation of heavy oil recovery processes which utilize light hydrocarbon solvents in conjunction with steam or as an alternative to steam-only processes to mobilize the in-situ heavy oil. The key benefits of employing solvent are improved economics and increased recovery from resource that is impractical with steam-only processes, improved environmental performance, particularly reduced greenhouse gas emissions and reduced water use. A suite of field trials, pilots and commercial applications have been operating over the past several years at Imperial Oil's Cold Lake field in Alberta, Canada. These have included both solvent-assisted and solvent-only field trials. Collectively, the results of these trials show that solvent recovery processes for heavy oil are technically viable and have considerable commercial potential. This paper summarizes the dimensions of the integrated research program that have been key to delivering the successful results to date. Simulation, laboratory testing and physical modelling with a focus on scaling to the field have been employed extensively prior to field testing. Short-term, relatively low cost field trials have been utilized to calibrate models prior to more costly, longer term pilots with dedicated facilities. Extensive field characterization has been conducted prior to final site selection and pilot operation. Integrated operational and surveillance plans have been employed to ensure measurable and reliable field performance data is acquired that can be used to calibrate and validate simulation performance. Finally, learnings from this integrated research program can be more broadly applied to the commercialization of other EOR processes and the research and development processes leading up to the decision to execute a major pilot. Introduction Thermal recovery processes including steam flooding, cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) and steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) are among the most broadly applied and commercially successful enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. In recent years there has been considerable growth in production utilizing these methods in the Canadian oil sands deposits which are primarily located in the Cold Lake and Athabasca regions of Alberta. These processes can be very efficient and economic when applied in thick, high porosity, high permeability reservoir deposits. However, significant volumes of natural gas are required to generate the steam used in these processes and associated with the steam generation are greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. There are strong economic, technical and environmental drivers to develop enhanced thermal recovery processes that reduce steam utilization, enable more efficient recovery from lower quality resources and improve environmental performance. The enhanced heavy oil recovery processes described in this paper target these challenges. An overview of this integrated technology development program was provided previously by Boone et al1. This paper reports on the continued successful development in subsequent years and expands on some of the key factors for success. Those factors include:A long term dedicated research program in the area of heavy oil recoveryDisciplined application of a gated research processA host field where pilots and field trials are strongly supported by management and competently supported by skilled and experienced operating personnel
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle