PHYSIOLOGICAL COSTS OF FIRE FIGHTER OCCUPATIONAL FITNESS TESTS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The purpose of this project was to evaluate the physiological costs associated with Fire Fighter occupational fitness tests. Metabolic and heart rate responses of incumbent Fire Fighters were recorded while they performed occupational fitness tests designed to simulate the challenges of Fire Fighting using an established series of isolated component tests and during a circuit of typical Fire Fighting procedures (known as the Combat Challenge). The first cohort included 15 incumbent Fire Fighters whose results on the isolated component tests were compared to those from our candidate database (N = 127). Laboratory treadmill testing was performed (Vmax Sensormedics) to establish VO2max and HRmax. Field testing was conducted using the COSMED portable VO2 system. Participants wore a 40 pound weighted vest and 4 pound ankle weights during the component tests and wore NFPA approved jacket, pants, boots, gloves, helmet and SCOTT air pack during the circuit/Combat Challenge test. During the Combat Challenge, incumbents were instructed to work at a pace that they felt best represented the pace required at a real fire although total time to complete each test was recorded. Following the tests, the incumbents were asked to complete a short questionnaire rating their perception of the tests' accuracy and reliability in simulating the real tasks of Fire Fighting. Mean VO2 of the Fire Fighters was 50.17 mlO2/kg/min and was not significantly different from the candidates (p>0.05). Both protocols elicited mean percent HRmax and mean percent VO2max responses between 90 û 100%, however these responses were sustained for a significantly longer duration during the circuit testing compared to the component testing which displayed brief peak values. The survey results indicated that the circuit/Combat Challenge test more accurately simulated the real tasks of Fire Fighting. The main recommendation from this project is that occupation fitness tests for Fire Fighting should involve a circuit of routine Fire Fighting tasks in contrast to a series of isolated component tests. The results suggest that a circuit test is preferred over the traditional Fire Fighter occupation fitness testing in order to best simulate the combined musculoskeletal and cardiovascular stressors of Fire Fighting. This project was supported by the Kitchener Fire Department.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».