MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2006764912 · doi:10.1002/anie.201302327

Total Synthesis of (+)‐Linoxepin by Utilizing the Catellani Reaction

2013· article· en· W2006764912 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiquePlant-derived Lignans Synthesis and Bioactivity
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAustrian Science FundUniversity of TorontoDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Mots-clésChemistryCombinatorial chemistryLignanTotal synthesisStereochemistryMetathesisMoietyOrganic chemistryPolymer

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Molecular intelligence: The structurally novel lignan (+)-linoxepin is synthesized in an eight-step sequence. The enantioselective synthesis features the palladium-catalyzed Catellani reaction as the key step. In this highly convergent multicomponent reaction, two new carbon–carbon bonds are formed, one of which results from a CH bond functionalization. Lignans are a diverse class of plant-derived natural products belonging to the phytooestrogen family. They have long been used as herbal remedies for pain, rheumatoid arthritis, and warts.1 However, more recently, lignans exhibiting immunosuppressive activity, tumor growth inhibition, and anti-fungal properties have been used in disease therapy, such as the anticancer agent etoposide.2 In 2007, Schmidt and co-workers isolated a lignan from the aerial parts of Linum perenne L. (Linaceae) with a previously undescribed carbon skeleton, which they named linoxepin (1).3 This caffeic acid dimer exhibits an oxidation-prone dihydronaphthalene core, a tetrasubstituted double bond embedded within a highly strained ring system, and a dibenzo–dihydrooxepine moiety, which is unique within this class of molecules. These interesting structural characteristics and their associated challenges make (+)-linoxepin (1) an interesting synthetic target. As means to address the tetrasubstituted aromatic A-ring embedded in the structure of 1, we envisioned using the palladium-catalyzed Catellani reaction. This process would allow the installation of all of the carbon atoms needed to prepare compound 1. The selective formation of multiple bonds in a single step has become an attractive way to construct highly complex frameworks that would be difficult to access using classical methods.4 Therefore, the use of transition-metal-catalyzed domino reactions is an interesting strategy for the assembly of complex natural products. During the preparation of this manuscript, Tietze and co-workers published a ten-step synthesis of (±)-linoxepin (1) using an elegant palladium-catalyzed domino reaction to construct two of the five rings found in the natural product.5 Herein, we report the first asymmetric synthesis of (+)-1 in eight steps using our modified version of the Catellani reaction.6 In this transformation, norbornene is used to facilitate an ortho C-H functionalization between an aryl iodide and an alkyl halide (Scheme 1). Along with methodology studies, our group has recently reported the use of this powerful reaction for the synthesis of molecular motors and highly substituted phenanthridines.11 Proposed mechanism of the Catellani reaction. The precise mechanism of this reaction is still under investigation, but it is known that the complex catalytic cycle is initiated by a Pd0 catalyst that oxidatively adds into the ArI bond of 5 to form intermediate (A), which then carbopalladates norbornene to furnish intermediate (B). The lack of a suitable β-hydrogen prevents syn-β-hydride elimination. Instead, base-mediated CH activation occurs to form palladacycle (C), which may follow one of two pathways: Oxidative addition to alkyl halide 6 can produce PdIV intermediate D-I, which upon reductive elimination forms intermediate E.9 Another plausible sequence is a transmetalation between two different PdII centers (D-II), which forms E following reductive elimination.10 Expulsion of norbornene by retro carbopalladation affords intermediate (F). Finally, a Mizoroki–Heck type reaction completes the catalytic cycle, thus affording the desired caffeic acid derivative 4 in a single step.7–10 Our retrosynthetic analysis (Scheme 2) begins with the opening of the E-ring (2) followed by subsequent opening of the B-ring (3). Aldehyde 3 can be obtained from cinnamic acid derivative 4, which would be obtained by the key Catellani reaction. Ether 5 could be obtained by the condensation of iodo-guaiacol 11 and benzyl iodide 10. Iodolactone 6 is a known compound and can be synthesized in enantiomerically pure or racemic form by the procedure published by Zutter et al.12, 13 Retrosynthetic analysis of (+)-linoxepin (1). Concurrent with our enantioselective synthesis, we undertook a racemic synthesis.14 Our synthesis began with the formylation of commercially available 5-bromobenzo[d][1,3]dioxole (8).15 The crude material was reduced with NaBH4 to the corresponding benzyl alcohol 9. Treating 9 with TMSCl and NaI gave benzyl iodide 10 in quantitative yield. Directed ortho lithiation of guaiacol, followed by quenching with iodine, furnished intermediate 11. Williamson ether synthesis delivered Catellani precursor 5 (Scheme 3). Synthesis of the aryliodide 5. a) i) HNiPr2, nBuLi, THF, −78 °C, 1 h; ii) DMF, THF, −78 °C→RT, 95 %; b) NaBH4, THF, reflux, 90 min, 97 %; c) TMSCl, NaI, CH3CN, RT, 1 h, 99 %; d) DHP, PPTS, CH2Cl2, RT, 4 h, 95 %; e) i) nBuLi, THF, RT, 7 h; ii) I2, THF, −50 °C→RT, 16 h, 98 %; f) 10, K2CO3, acetone, reflux, 94 %. DHP=3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran; PPTS=pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate. With aryl iodide 5 in hand, the stage was set for our key step. Under the previously optimized conditions, the formation of the desired tricycle (±)-4 proceeded smoothly in 92 % yield of isolated product to furnish 860 mg of the advanced intermediate (Scheme 4). Key step: Catellani reaction. a) Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol %), PPh3 (22 mol %), norbornene, Cs2CO3, DMF (sealed tube), 90 °C, 5 h, 92 %. Preliminary studies indicated that the formation of the tetra-substituted double bond was challenging,16 and so an aldol condensation was envisaged in the last step. When (±)-4 was subjected to the Mizoroki–Heck conditions, oxepane 12 was formed in high yield (Scheme 5). However, all attempts at oxidative cleavage of the trisubstituted olefin failed and led to the formation of a complex mixture of products, which is presumably due to steric hindrance or the electron-rich aromatic ring. X-ray crystallographic analysis confirmed the extreme crowding in 12. Attempted synthesis of (±)-linoxepin (1). a) PdCl2 (20 mol %), PPh3 (44 mol %) NEt3 (10 equiv), microwave radiation, DMF, 130 °C, 7 h, 99 %. An alternative strategy was explored wherein the aldol condensation preceded the Mizoroki–Heck reaction. To this end, intermediate 4 was oxidatively cleaved to aldehyde 3 under Lemieux–Johnson conditions.17 TiCl4 mediated condensation led to the formation of the B-ring in 49 % yield over two steps. The resulting tetracycle 2 was subjected to the established Mizoroki–Heck reaction conditions, which we successfully applied in the synthesis of 12. Clean formation of a single product was observed, but subsequent characterization by a number of methods including X-ray crystallographic analysis, revealed that the isomeric alkene (±)-14, which we have named iso-linoxepin, was formed (Scheme 6). Undesired formation of (±)-iso-linoxepin (14). a) OsO4, NaIO4, TEBAC, THF/H2O 5:3, RT, 98 %; b) TiCl4, NEt3, CH2Cl2, −78 °C→−25 °C→RT, 3 h, 49 %; c) PdCl2 (20 mol %), PPh3 (44 mol %) NEt3 (10 equiv), microwave radiation, DMF, 130 °C, 7 h, 74 %; E=CO2tBu, TEBAC=triethylbenzylammonium chloride. We assume that the formation of undesired (±)-iso-linoxepin 14 arises from the elimination of a more accessible syn β-hydrogen under the reaction conditions (Scheme 7, pathway C). Conversely, this undesired process is attenuated by replacing NEt3 with a carboxylate base, allowing 1 to be obtained without 14 being formed. Although we do not know the exact origin of this change in selectivity, we can rationalize the result by formation of the Pd enolate so as to generate the diastereomeric intermediate 18, which can undergo syn-β-hydride elimination (pathway B).18 Other mechanisms that achieve the same result include a CH activation (pathway A)8, 19 or anti-β-hydride elimination.20 Mechanistic rationale for the formation of (±)-1 and (±)-14:21 15 was obtained by the oxidative addition of Pd0 to (±)-2; pathway A: CH activation pathway by highly electrophilic Ar–Pd species; pathway B: Generation of a syn β-hydride (Hb) by a Pd-enolate; Pathway C: Formation of (±)-iso-linoxepin 14 by a syn β-hydride elimination of Ha; conditions: a) PdCl2 (20 mol %), PPh3 (44 mol %) NEt3 (10 equiv), microwave radiation, DMF, 130 °C, 7 h, 74 %; b) PdCl2 (20 mol %), PPh3 (44 mol %), CsOAc (10.0 equiv), DMF, 75 °C, 4 h, 78 %. With an optimized route towards (±)-1, the stage was set for the enantiopure synthesis of (+)-1. Therefore (+)-6 was prepared according the procedure of Zutter12 and subjected to the Catellani reaction. Optically active cinnamic acid derivative (−)-4 was obtained with the same efficiency as its racemic counterpart. Although we were unable to determine the ee value of the product, conversion into dihydronaphthalene 2 provided an opportunity, and the ee was found to be 93 %. (+)-Linoxepin was directly formed by heating cyclization precursor (+)-2 under Mizoroki–Heck conditions using cesium acetate as base (Scheme 8). These conditions resulted in the formation of the desired natural product (+)-linoxepin in 76 % yield. The partial loss of stereochemical information by the initial formation of iso-linoxepin (14) and subsequent base-mediated conversion into linoxepin (1) can be excluded. All attempts to convert (±)-14 into its double-bond isomer 1 failed and resulted either in the recovery of unreacted starting material or in the formation of complex mixtures of highly fluorescent products. Synthesis of (+)-linoxepin (1). a) PdCl2 (20 mol %), PPh3 (44 mol %), CsOAc (10.0 equiv), DMF, 75 °C, 4 h, 76 %. In conclusion, we have achieved the enantioselective, protecting-group-free, total synthesis of the challenging lignan (+)-linoxepin 1 using domino CH functionalization with an overall yield of 30 %. This synthesis is the first reported application of the palladium-catalyzed Catellani reaction in the synthesis of a complex natural product. We note that the optical rotation of the synthetic material is higher (+90.0; c=0.25, CHCl3) than the reported value (+23.0; c=0.93, CHCl3). All of the spectroscopic data of the final product are in complete agreement with the published data from the isolated material. It is noteworthy that Tietze and co-workers observed a higher optical rotation in their resolved material than was found in the isolated material (+96.1; c=0.61, CHCl3).5 X-ray crystallographic analysis unambiguously confirms the reported structure of linoxepin (1). We are continuing to investigate the origin of the change in regioselectivity in the final Mizoroki Heck reaction and will provide further details as they become available. Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Johann Mulzer As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,321

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,224
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle