Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This is a summary of an interview with Edet Belzberg, director of Watchers of the Sky. Author Notes Rubina (Ruby) Ramji is an Associate Professor in the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies at Cape Breton University. After serving as a Chair of the Religion, Film and Visual Culture Group for the American Academy of Religion and then the steering committee, Rubina continues to serve on the Executive Committee for the Canadian Society for the Study of Religion as President and is the Film Editor of the Journal of Religion and Film. Her research activities focus on the areas of religion, media and identity, religion in Canada, and religion and immigration. This sundance film festival review is available in Journal of Religion & Film: http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol18/iss1/38 Interview with Edet Belzberg, Director of Watchers of the Sky Edet Belzberg made her directorial debut with the film Children Underground, which premiered at the Sundance Film Festival in 2001: it documented unwanted children placed in orphanages in Romania who were now living in the streets after the fall of Communism. Not afraid to examine emotionally tragic situations where people are displaced and discarded, Belzberg’s next documentary Watchers of the Sky doesn’t shy away from the raw emotion of humanity’s cruelty to others. Belzberg has a connection with Raphael Lemkin; both are Jewish and know the history of genocide that has been inflicted upon the worldwide Jewish community for centuries. When asked if she felt the need to examine the topic of genocide as a Jew, Belzberg felt that she wanted to move beyond the Jewish element of genocide, to capture humanity: humanity’s ability to destroy its own people, and humanity’s ability to fight for the rights of the people, all people. This documentary is, in a way, Belzberg’s witnessing of genocide that has devastatingly affected peoples of different religions, ethnicities, and nationalities within their home countries. Belzberg outlined Lemkin’s mission to see the 1 Ramji: Interview with Edet Belzberg Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2014 beauty in humanity, while also understanding that the wiping out of one group equals the wiping of culture as a whole. In effect, this documentary illustrates Lemkin’s trajectory from being Jewish to becoming a Humanist – his concern to end genocide was not only based on what happened to his family in Poland and in World War II, but also what happened to the Armenians and other groups that were systematically displaced or killed by their own country members because they were of a different religion or race. He gave his life to bring about a law to punish those who use sovereignty as an excuse to wipe out entire groups. Not only does Belzberg use the writings and voices of lawmakers and politicians to show how genocide must stop, but she takes a perilous but necessary step in the documentary, by providing the viewer with individual faces and lives that have been devastated by genocide, people who have lost all their family members, who have been displaced from their homelands and live as refugees, living nowhere and forgotten by the world. This daring step provides the viewer with a much needed emotional connection to the concept of genocide, its effects on the lives of people, and its effects on humanity; we are implicated in the continuation of these atrocious acts occurring in the world right now. Benjamin Ferencz is also a major focus of Watchers of the Sky: Belzberg wishes to show how he has taken a twentieth century legal model, created by Lemkin, and is moulding it into 21st century law. His legal work to end crimes of aggression began in Nuremberg as a chief prosecutor, and he has spent his life 2 Journal of Religion & Film, Vol. 18 [2014], Iss. 1, Art. 38 http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol18/iss1/38 trying to fulfill Lemkin’s mission of creating international laws to prosecute those who commit these atrocities. Ferencz is like Lemkin; both are aware that humanity is driven to commit these acts over and over again. In a way, Edet Belzberg has played her own part in being a watcher of the sky; she has created a work of art that will help those on the mission to create a way to end genocide or at least prosecute those who continue to commit it. One hopes that her work as a watcher will influence future law makers to see how we continue, as a human race, to allow nations to persecute and kill their own members and to see that this must stop, now.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,030 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».