Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Following on from the success of our first edition, we see the publication of our second. Again we present articles from a diverse geographical and specialty perspective. A balance between science, education and clinical practice continues. From subject matter dealing with diabetic foot infections to the scientific study of reepithelialisation – we provide a truly international flavour. Our authorship spans the globe providing a unique insight to our readership. Our subject matter is appropriate and applicable, at some level, for our diverse readership. Indeed an article in our first edition and my own editorial stimulated two Canadian colleagues to provide their perspectives on infected wounds – the beginning of an international dialogue on an important clinical issue. In this edition we publish a review of topical negative pressure therapy (TNP), presenting information regarding its development, proliferation and applicability. This is particularly important in view of the current levels of interest in this subject. A similar review of the medical and surgical management of diabetic foot infections provides clinically applicable approaches to care, again of clinical importance in view of the number of patients seen globally with this challenging clinical problem. On the research front we present articles covering compression and reepithelialisation which provide important information regarding key elements with respect to wound healing. The relevance of these papers is in both challenging the mode of action of compression bandages and presenting research in an often neglected aspect of the healing process. Our interesting, unusual clinical challenges weild two interesting cases from our colleagues in India. These cases are not only unusual but also bring a perspective from a different clinical arena with a distinct surgical flavour. As discussed in our first edition, it is our intent to grow our Editorial Advisory Board to ensure diversity from both geography and clinical specialty. You will note that for our second edition we have some additional members increasing our reach in Latin America, Asia and the Middle East. In keeping with the internationalisation of wound care, via the World Union Congress in Paris, we are privileged to have the unique situation of a double second: the second World Union Congress and the launch of the second edition of the International Wound Journal. Our desire to become the pre-eminent resource for wound care providers is fast becoming a reality. Please consider submitting articles and tell your friends and colleagues about this new journal if you feel it is providing you with useful information. If you are attending the World Union meeting in Paris, please come and talk to me and let me know your views regarding the International Wound Journal. •Editor-in-ChiefProf. Keith Harding •EditorDr Douglas Queen •StatisticianProf. Patricia Price •Editorial ExecutivesProf. David Armstrong Dr Paul Banwell Dr Kyoichi Matsuzaki Prof. Christine Moffatt Heather Orsted Prof. Marco Romanelli Prof. Hiromi Sanada Prof. Gregory Schultz Prof. Gary Sibbald Prof. Mike Stacey Geoff Sussman Dr Luc Téot •Editorial OfficeInternational Wound Journal PO Box 2394 Cardiff CF23 9WQ UK •Editorial AssistantSue Harding •Production EditorJennifer Dick
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».