MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2008301680 · doi:10.1353/can.2012.0047

The Making of Modern Medicine: Turning Points in the History of Disease (review)

2012· article· en· W2008301680 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Casey Hurrell

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHistory of Medical Practice
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBLISSFatalismHistory of medicineHistoryClassicsArt historyMedicinePhilosophyTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Making of Modern Medicine: Turning Points in the History of Disease Casey Hurrell The Making of Modern Medicine: Turning Points in the History of Disease. Michael Bliss. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2010. Pp. 112. $21.95 This slender volume takes the reader through a ‘greatest hits’ of Michael Bliss’s own work as an historian of medicine and Canada. The structure and concept for the book was born out of the lectures that Bliss gave for the Joanne Goodman series at the University of [End Page 685] Western Ontario in 2008, and charts the progression from religious fatalism to the age of fervent belief in medicine’s ability to cure disease, save lives, and soothe souls. Building upon themes and incidents covered in his previous works, Bliss examines three key turning points in medical science between 1885 and 1922 to show the evolution of society’s relationship with health. First, he turns to the last great outbreak of smallpox in the Western world at Montreal in 1885, which established the benchmark for the religiously based fatalism that gradually evaporated by the end of the period. Then, Bliss traces the career of Sir William Osler, who had practiced in Montreal during the epidemic, and later brought his scientific, research-based approach to medicine to the 1893 founding of Johns Hopkins medical school in Baltimore. The final case study explores how the faith in scientific research that Osler instilled at Hopkins was taken up at other medical schools and contributed to the discovery of insulin at the University of Toronto in 1922. Each of the case studies has a Canadian connection, and Bliss suggests that Canada continually punched above its weight where health care was concerned. Canada can certainly claim Sir William Osler as its own, and the insulin therapy for diabetes was an unquestionably important contribution to the history of medicine. Moreover, the importance of the North Atlantic triangle and the multinational character of scientific discovery is a constant refrain. Canada was able to play such a pivotal role in the forward march of medical science by virtue of its place between Great Britain and the United States. Bliss also alludes to the funding structures of Canadian hospitals, medical schools, and scientific laboratories – another area of overlap between American philanthropy and Canadian achievement that underscores the international nature of scientific discovery in the period that continues to have relevance today. The central theme that links the entire narrative together is the gradual substitution of faith in the healing power of medicine for the traditional religious acceptance of disease and death. Given the prominent place occupied by Sir William Osler in each of the episodes that Bliss recounts, it is perhaps unsurprising that the intersection of faith and science underpins the entire volume. As the son of a clergyman, Osler was well-acquainted with the consolation that religion could provide at the time of an individual’s death. Over the course of his life, he witnessed the turn away from religious fatalism and belief in God to the secular faith in health care, evidenced not least by the tendency to deify physicians. Furthermore, with the elongation of life [End Page 686] comes a fear of mortality, and the tendency to disparage physicians who are unsuccessful in their attempts to stave off fatal disease is the clear legacy of the progression from religion to science as the basis for society’s understanding of the force that is responsible for determining life and death. For all the breadth in this short study, Bliss’s argument continually returns to advancements in laboratory science. Though he is attentive to the role of religion and poverty in influencing the response of Montrealers to vaccination campaigns in the 1880s, and emphasizes the contributions of philanthropic organizations in funding the medical research itself, these factors serve as mere supporting characters in the larger narrative. In orienting the book thus, Bliss devalues the impact that improved nutrition, sanitation, and housing had on the morbidity and mortality of Canadians and people around the world. The tension between the magic bullet cures and public health measures that have the capacity to improve the health of entire populations is...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,019
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,120
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,993

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,019
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,064
Tête enseignante GPT0,321
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical ReviewMême sujetHistory of Medical PracticeTravaux en français237 207