MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2008547190 · doi:10.2118/02-09-ge1

The Evolution of Environmental Reporting in the Petroleum Industry in Canada

2002· article· en· W2008547190 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Irene M. Herremans, Sandy Hershcovis

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Établissements canadiensQueen's UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCorporationCharterStakeholderLegislationGovernment (linguistics)Corporate social responsibilityBusinessPetroleum industryCorporate communicationPublic relationsLaw and economicsEconomicsPolitical scienceLawFinanceEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Pressures from various stakeholder groups have pushed petroleum companies to higher standards regarding environmental performance. While many companies have improved their performance, few have yet to provide adequate communications. With more institutions recognizing the impact that environmental performance has on economic performance, it is essential that the industry communicate what it is doing environmentally. Such communication will ensure that informed decisions are made by both the industry and its stakeholders. Societal Contracts and Legitimization Contemporary thinking regards business as a subset of society. Society grants corporations the freedom to manage a significant portion of its scarce resources and gives corporations certain rights through the granting of an implicit charter. With corporate rights come corporate responsibilities, one of which is to produce not only adequate economic output but also environmentally and socially acceptable output. Society needs evidence to form a basis for a decision for renewal of the corporate charter. If the corporation does not provide that evidence, society must use other, perhaps incomplete, sources. If corporate disclosure is constant and credible, it not only lends support for renewal of the corporate charter and survival of the corporation, but it can also ward off government legislation or other negative activities that may act as road blocks in the enterprise's attempt to accomplish its objectives. To legitimize itself the corporation must understand society's expectations and communicate, as well as partake in, behaviour that is consistent with society's definition of a legitimateenterprise of the 2000s. Based on the work of Blau and Scott(1), Eells(2), and Zenisek(3), Figure 1: The Model for Sustainability depicts a corporation that fits with the ever-evolving demands and expectations of society. The model suggests that three dimensions must remain congruent:the corporation's ideology;the corporation's behaviours; andsociety's demands and expectations. If a gap exists between any of these dimensions, a corporation will not be perceived as legitimate by society and is thereby deemed to be unsustainable. Communication's Role in the Process The petroleum industry became shockingly aware of the importance of communication in the legitimization process at the time of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Exxon as well as the other Alyeska members were concerned about the potential of increased regulation of the industry due to the public outcry of dissatisfaction with the industry's performance. Therefore, Exxon and the Alyeska members attempted to legitimize themselves through increased environmental disclosures in their annual reports(4). Since that time environmental reporting has evolved from statements or short sections of qualitative discussion in annual reports to standalone documents (both hard copy and electronic). The first-stand alone documents were green glossies and newsletters. Now, progressive corporations link their environmental reporting to their environmental management systems, and regard reporting as an important "learning" process in improving environmental performance. However, the evolution continues toward sustainability, recognizing the integration of economic, environmental, and social activities (See Figure 2: Evolution of Reporting Illustration). Driving Forces Most early attempts at environmental communication were driven by concern about incongruencies in the Model for Sustainability.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,122
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,887

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,022
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0070,012
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,002
Communication savante0,0050,001
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,199 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologyMême sujetGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchTravaux en français237 207