Sunitinib (SU) in Combination with Trastuzumab (T) for the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): Activity and Safety Results from a Phase II Study.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: SU is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET, FLT3, and CSF-1R, with single-agent activity in patients (pts) with heavily pretreated ABC (locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer). T is approved for 2nd-line monotherapy and in combination with taxane-based therapies for 1st-line ABC. The combination of SU + T in HER2+ ABC pts was investigated.Materials and methods: Eligible pts with HER2+ ABC received a starting dose of oral SU 37.5 mg/d (continuous daily dosing [CDD]) and either T administered wkly (iv loading 4 mg/kg then wkly 2 mg/kg) or q3w (loading 8 mg/kg then q3w 6 mg/kg). Due to changing standard of care, the trial was amended to include pts having prior chemotherapy in the 1st-line setting. Previous treatment (tx) with T (± lapatinib) was permitted. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), pharmacokinetics (PK) and quality of life (QoL).Results: As of April 2009, 60 pts were enrolled (6 on the original protocol and 54 under the amendment). Of 54 pts enrolled post-amendment, 6 pts continue on study and 48 have discontinued, 12 due to AEs. Most (n=31; 57%) pts received SU + T as 1st-line tx and 11/31 pts were completely tx-naïve. Pts received a median of 5 cycles (range: 1–16) of SU and 4 cycles (range: 1–15) of T. SU was dose reduced from 37.5 mg/d to 25 mg/d in 39% of pts. All pts were evaluable for safety and 52 pts were evaluable for efficacy. ORR was 34.6% and clinical benefit rate was 48% (2 CR; 16 PR; 7 SD ≥24 wks). Of the 18 responders, 5 pts were completely tx-naïve and 9 pts were 1st-line. Median PFS was 25.3 wks (95% CI, 19.3, 29.1). Most AEs were G1/2. G3 non-hematologic AEs in ≥10% pts were asthenia (17%) and hypertension (11%) and 3 G4 events occurred (LVEF decline, pulmonary embolism, and pancreatitis). Hematologic AEs (G3/4 in ≥10% pts) were neutropenia (22%) and thrombocytopenia (17%). One G5 event (cardiogenic shock) was reported. LVEF decline/LV dysfunction occurred in 21 pts (6 pts had ≥G3 AEs); 18/21 pts (86%) had received prior anthracycline and 12 pts (57%) prior T. There was no significant on-tx change from baseline in the QoL domain. Mean (SD) steady state level for SU was 46.1 (25.9) ng/mL in agreement with prior observations.Conclusions: The combination of SU (37.5 mg/d; CDD schedule) + T (wkly or q3w) showed acceptable tolerability and antitumor activity in HER2+ ABC pts without adversely affecting overall QoL. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 201.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».