From<i>bosquet a l'angloise</i>to<i>jardin a l'angloise</i>The progression of the mingled manner of planting from its inception to its decline and survival
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. For example: Christopher Hussey, The Picturesque: Studies in a Point of View (London and New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1927); H. F. Clark, The English Landscape Garden (London: Pleiades, 1948), pp. 3–5; Derek Clifford, A History of Garden Design (London: Faber & Faber, 1966), p. 136. 2. Hussey, The Picturesque, p. 8. 3. Mark Laird, The Flowering of the Landscape Garden: English Pleasure Grounds 1720–1800 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999) provides a profound analysis of planting design of the emerging landscape garden; Clemens Alexander Wimmer, Bäume und Sträucher in historischen Gärten: Gehölzverwendung in Geschichte und Denkmalpflege (Dresden: Verlag der Kunst, 2001) provides a historical overview of the use of woody vegetation through an encyclopaedic treatment of various authorities arranged under predetermined garden styles. 4. The Oxford English Dictionary online credits Lady Luxborough with the first use of the word shrubbery, in a letter to William Shenstone dated 16 October 1748, quoted in Letters to William Shenstone (1775), p. 56: ‘Nature has been so remarkably kind this last October to adorn my Shrubbery with the flowers that usually blow at Whitsuntide’. 5. Jan Woudstra, ‘The early eighteenth century wilderness at Stainborough’, New Arcadian Journal, 57/58, 2004–05, pp. 65–84. 6. see: Jan Woudstra, The Wilderness in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century Gardens: History and Conservation Case Studies, MA thesis, Institute of Advanced Architectural Studies, University of York, 1986; ‘The bosquet and wilderness’ in David Jacques and Arend Jan van der Horst, The Gardens of William and Mary (London: Christopher Helm, 1988), pp. 153–166. 7. Philip Miller, The Gardener's Dictionary (London, 1731), under Wilderness. 8. NA (Kew), Work 5/52, 1701–2. 9. NA (Kew), Work 5/53, f. 441: 22 August 1702–7 January 1702/3. 10. Joseph Addison (1672–1719) in The Spectator, No. 477, 6 September 1712, reprinted in Gregory Smith (ed.), Addison & Steele and others: The Spectator (London, Melbourne and Toronto: Dent, 1907, 1979 edition), Vol. IV, pp. 11–14. 11. John Laurence, ‘The Clergy-Man's Recreation’ (London, 1717), p. 23. 12. Thomas Fairchild, The City Gardener (London, 1722), p. 12ff. 13. Batty Langley, New Principles of Gardening (London, 1728), section xxi, p. 182. 14. Langley, New Principles of Gardening (London, 1728), p. ix. 15. Batty Langley, A Sure Method of Improving Estates (London, 1728), p. 90ff. 16. Langley, New Principles of Gardening, e.g. on plate v. 17. Philip Miller, The Gardener's Dictionary (London, 1731), under Wilderness. 18. For the original reference to Sharawadgi, see: Sir William Temple, ‘Upon the Gardens of Epicurus, with other XVIIth Century Garden Essays’, in Sir William Temple and others, The King's Classics: Essays on Gardens (London: Chatto & Windus, 1908), pp. 1–65 (54); Takau Shimada, ‘Is sharawadgi derived from the Japanese word sorowaji?’ The Review of English Studies, 48/191, 1997, pp. 350–352 (352); Ciaran Murray, Sharawadgi: The Romantic Return to Nature (London: International Scholars Publications, 1999); Ciaran Murray, ‘Sharawadgi resolved’, Garden History, 26/2, 1998, pp. 208–213 (210); Lei Gao and Jan Woudstra, ‘Re-solving Sharawadgi: some thoughts on its Chinese roots’, Shakkei, 17/1, 2010, pp. 2–9. 19. Philip Miller, The Gardener's Dictionary (London, 1740), under Wilderness. 20. William Chambers, Designs of Chinese Buildings, Furniture, Dresses, Machines, and Utensils (London, 1757), p. 17. 21. William Chambers, A Dissertation on Oriental Gardening (Dublin, 1773), pp. 55–56. 22. J. C. Loudon, An Encyclopaedia of Gardening (London, 1822), pp. 916–917; v. (London, 1834), pp. 1009–1010. 23. On Picturesque debate see: John Dixon Hunt, The Picturesque Garden in Europe (London: Thames and Hudson, 2002). 24. William Marshall, On Planting and Rural Ornament (London, 1803), ii, pp. 437–451. 25. Walter Nicol, The Villa Garden Directory (Edinburgh, 1814), p. 15. 26. J. C. Loudon, An Encyclopaedia of Gardening (London, 1822), pp. 912–7, 1022–8. 27. J. C. Loudon, An Encyclopaedia of Gardening (London, 1822), p. 904. 28. See, e.g., Johan Hermann Knoop, Beschrijving van Plantagie-Gewassen (Amsterdam and Dordrecht, 1790), p. 4. 29. A ‘bosquet à l'angloise’ even featured in a contemporary play: Mlle A. C. de Kinschott, Le philosophe soit-disant (Maestricht, 1767), p. 15 (see: Elizabeth Blood, ‘Adapting to the Theater: Representations of the ‘Philosophe’ by French Women Writers’ in Altered Writings, Servanne Woodward, ed. (London, Canada: Mestengo, 1997), pp. 109–142). 30. Wimmer, Bäume und Sträucher in historischen Gärten (2001), p. 87. 31. Wimmer, Bäume und Sträucher in historischen Gärten (2001), pp. 84–86. 32. Christian Cay Lorenz Hirschfeld, Theorie der Gartenkunst, i (Leipzig, 1779), pp. 72–73 (author's translation). 33. Christian Cay Lorenz Hirschfeld, Theorie der Gartenkunst, iv (Leipzig, 1782), pp. 48–64. 34. J. C. Krauss, Afbeeldingen der Fraaiste Meest Uitheemsche Boomen en Heesters die tot Versiering van Engelsche Bosschen en Tuinen op onzen Grond, kunnen Geplant en Gekweekt worden … (Amsterdam, 1802). 35. F. M. Piper, Beskrifning öfwer Idéen och General-Plan till en Ängelsk Lustpark forfattead aren 1811 och 1812 [Descriptions of the Idea and General-Plan for an English Park] (Stockholm: Byggforlaget, 2004), p. 151, plus p. 36 of original ms; my translation of the wording is added from that given, included between [square brackets]. 36. J. C. Loudon, ‘Foreign notices. Germany’, Gardener's Magazine iv (1828), p. 494. 37. J. C. Loudon, ‘Foreign notices. Germany’, Gardener's Magazine iv (1828), p. 492. 38. W. S. Brussels, ‘Landscape-gardening at Munich’, Gardener's Magazine v (1829), p. 210. 39. Charles Sckell, ‘Observations on the landscape-gardening of Germany, as compared with that of England’ Gardener's Magazine x (1834), pp. 197–200; see Jan Woudstra, ‘The Sckell Family in England (1770–1830)’, Die Gartenkunst, 14/2, 2002, pp. 211–220. 40. Prince Pückler Muskau, Tour in England, Ireland and France in the Years 1826, 1827, 1828 and 1829 (Philadelphia, 1833), Vol. i, p. 19. 41. Prince Pückler Muskau, Hints on Landscape Gardening, ed. Samuel Parsons (Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1917), pp. 71–72. 42. Pückler Muskau, Hints on Landscape Gardening (1917), pp. 73–74.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle