The Devil in Babylon: Fear of Progress and the Birth of Modern Life (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Devil in Babylon: Fear of Progress and the Birth of Modern Life Keith Walden The Devil in Babylon: Fear of Progress and the Birth of Modern Life. Allan Levine. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 2005. Pp. 436, illus. $36.99 Had I not agreed to review this book, I probably would have put it down after reading two or three chapters because it was not saying anything new. Levine is not writing for me, but for those who are not familiar with the social and cultural history of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, this is a sprightly introduction, focusing mainly on American experiences, but also drawing on British and Canadian ones as well. In chapters on immigration, women's suffrage, scientific ideas (particularly eugenics and evolution), the Red scare, Prohibition, technology, sexuality and leisure, and Hollywood, Levine outlines some of the major sources of anxiety that shaped the modern era. Three sub-themes run through most of the sections: attention to Winnipeg personalities and incidents to provide the Canadian perspective; the contributions of Jews in creating modern life; and the extent of anti-Semitism in fuelling fears about modernity. Within each of the chapters, short biographies of representative figures and potted accounts of well-known events, like the Winnipeg General Strike, the Scopes 'Monkey' trial, and the Fatty Arbuckle scandal, are used frequently to bring the period to life. This approach provides dramatic and human interest, but contributes to the impression that this is a survey of well-travelled ground, plotted with traditional instruments. It also means the perspective is highly selective. There is a lot about Henry Ford and the automobile, for example, but nothing about Edison and electricity. The Ku Klux Klan is mentioned in passing, but there is no extended discussion of it – a surprising omission, considering [End Page 343] the richness of the secondary sources about it and how clearly it was inspired by cultural anxiety. There is breadth here, to be sure, but not much depth. Even on the breadth side of the equation, the emphasis on fear of progress sometimes seems unbalanced, particularly in the Hollywood chapter, which deals mainly with efforts to censor the movies. The millions of North Americans who flocked to theatres weekly in the early twentieth century could not have been too worried about succumbing to celluloid corruption. A number of things about Levine's interpretation of modernity can be questioned. Was immigration the central springboard to modernity, as he seems to suggest? What about technological development or more efficient forms of capitalist organization? Was the automobile the key technological innovation? What about improvements in steel production or the spread of electrical energy? No doubt many readers will quibble about the work's omissions and biases, but too much complaining is beside the point. The book is not meant to be a comprehensive review of the period, based on exhaustive research. It is an introduction for general readers, and as such, does a commendable job. Levine is an engaging writer, with a keen sense of the boredom threshold of his audience. He has a sharp eye for interesting material and, despite my carping, is a talented historian. In particular, he is deft at pulling revealing quotations from his primary sources; those who have to write introductory lectures on these subjects may profit from a quick perusal of the relevant sections. I may not read them all, but I hope Allan Levine continues to write this sort of book and that he gets rich from the royalties. Keith Walden Trent University Copyright © 2006 University of Toronto Press
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».