MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2009390023 · doi:10.1353/mdr.0.0124

The Selected Letters of Thornton Wilder (review)

2009· article· en· W2009390023 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lincoln Konkle

Notice bibliographique

RevueModern Drama · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistoryChinaLiteratureArt historyClassicsArtArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Selected Letters of Thornton Wilder Lincoln Konkle Robin G. Wilder and Jackson R. Bryer, eds. The Selected Letters of Thornton Wilder. New York: HarperCollins, 2008. Pp. xxxviii + 768, illustrated. $39.95 (Hb). It goes without saying that any Thornton Wilder aficionado should read the recently published collection of his correspondence, for it is, in effect, a life in letters, and Wilder (1897–1975) lived one of the least ordinary and most literary lives among writers. Against the backdrop of two world wars, the Great Depression, the invention of the atomic bomb, and a culture-altering youth movement, Wilder lived in China, Wisconsin, California, Ohio, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Illinois, and once established as a writer, spent as much time travelling in Europe as he did living in the United States. He wrote prize-winning plays and novels, screenplays, libretti, translations, and scholarly articles; worked as a secondary school and college instructor and gave countless public lectures; served in both world wars and as a cultural diplomat; and met and became friends with some of the most influential writers and intellectuals of his time. Robin G. Wilder and Jackson R. Bryer have given us the full arc of that life in Wilder’s own words through this collection of 336 letters written between the ages of 12 and 78. [End Page 384] The collection is divided into six parts, each covering a decade of Wilder’s life. The story the letters tell is most dramatic in the first section, “Beginnings: 1909–1920,” which presents a portrait of the artist as a young man chomping at the bit to begin his writing career. The “bit” would be his father, Amos Parker Wilder, who did not approve of his son’s literary ambitions (which were encouraged by his mother, Isabella, especially when Amos was overseas serving as consul general in China). In the letters, young Thornton writes to his father, pleading to be given the opportunity to learn and practice the craft of a playwright, which was his earliest and ultimate ambition: “I write plays as I eat,” he wrote at Oberlin College (59). In subsequent sections, one is astonished at the wide range and sheer number of the famed contemporaries to whom Wilder wrote: from theatre people such as Katharine Cornell, Cheryl Crawford, Noël Coward, Ruth Gordon, Helen Hayes, Edward Albee, Alan Schneider, and Irene Worth, to writers such as Robert Frost, Ernest Hemingway, and Gertrude Stein. His letters often respond to those outside the arts who wrote him, such as Albert Einstein, or describe his meetings with those in and outside the arts: Jean-Paul Sartre, Alfred Hitchcock, Orson Welles, Ezra Pound, Sigmund Freud, Eleanor Roosevelt, Albert Schweitzer, and John F. Kennedy. As to Wilder’s private and inner life, the letters surprise, reaffirm, and leave ambiguous. He admonishes his older brother, “[Y]ou haven’t learned Morals, you’ve learned the Code of Morals. Politeness and Celibacy are a matter of indifference to God. Go deeper. If possible, sin yourself and discover the innocence of it” (141). As to the question of Wilder’s own sexuality, there are letters that might be read as expressing homosexual feelings but also references to heterosexual activity (e.g., an admission that he expected to be engaged to one or the other of two coeds at Oberlin, or that he visited two brothels, one in France and one in Mexico). He makes a telling statement in his late fifties: “[I]n fact, I’m one of the most extreme goers-alone I ever came across” (531). Though his religious interests and feelings are often expressed, one also finds letters in which Wilder seems to be foreshadowing Theatre of the Absurd: “Since in the twentieth century the Sublime has departed the earth, let us at least cherish the beautiful image of the ridiculous” (285). Any director of productions of Our Town, The Skin of Our Teeth, or The Matchmaker (or its musical incarnation Hello, Dolly!) will want, at least, to use the index to locate the passages concerning these plays, which reveal surprising insights into Wilder’s intentions in writing his theatrical works. Of his most famous play, he writes, There...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,474
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,389

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueModern DramaMême sujetCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary ResearchTravaux en français237 207