Abstract 1451: Microfluidic-based unbiased enrichment (negative selection) of circulating non-hematopoietic tumor cells directly from whole blood without centrifugation.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The enumeration and analysis of circulating non-hematopoietic tumor cells (CTCs) is of increasing interest for monitoring disease progression or response to treatment, specifically as a companion diagnostic for new anti-cancer drugs, and for research into the mechanisms of disease progression and metastases. Ideally, CTCs would be enriched from very small samples, with minimal handling, high recovery, and no requirement for the expression of specific surface markers. Two technologies have been combined to meet these requirements. Hematopoietic white blood cells (WBCs) in whole blood were first cross-linked to magnetic particles using EasySep™ anti-CD45 TAC. The sample was diluted and placed in a magnet for 30 min.; an outlet in the bottom of the sample tube was then opened and the sample flowed by gravity into a microfluidic chamber containing a high-precision micro-slit membrane. Red blood cells (RBCs) flowed through the microfluidic chamber, while larger cells such as CTCs were retained in the chamber. The cells in the chamber were washed with PBS and then identified by staining with Hoechst [nuclear], anti-cytokeratin antibodies [epithelial cells], and anti-CD45 antibodies [hematopoietic cells]. CTCs were defined as Hoechst+, cytokeratin+ and CD45-. The recovery of MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cells spiked into normal whole blood, at 10, 30, 50, or 100 cells / 2 mL blood was 95 ± 23% (7 ± 1, n=3 for 10 cells; 24 ± 3, n=3 for 30 cells; 57 ± 3, n=3 for 50 cells; 113 ± 27, n=3 for 100 cells) and the log depletion of WBCs exceeded 2.3. The recovery of H1975 lung adenocarcinoma cells spiked into normal whole blood, at 10, 30, 50, or 100 cells / 2 mL blood was 93 ± 8% (9 ± 1, n=3 for 10 cells; 28 ± 3, n=3 for 30 cells; 48 ± 6, n=3 for 50 cells; 94 ± 2, n=3 for 100 cells), and the log depletion of WBCs exceeded 2.14. 13 patient samples [10 NSCLC and 3 CRC] were processed with this method and CTCs were detected in every sample. The number of CTC detected from 2 mL of blood ranged from 1 to 51. WBC log depletion ranged from 2.01 to 2.79. No RBCs were observed on the membrane of the microfluidic chamber. The entire process requires ∼ 60 minutes and could easily be automated. RBC depletion is essentially complete without the use of centrifugation or chemicals which may be deleterious to CTCs. The minimal sample handling permits high recovery of desired cells, allowing the detection of CTCs in much smaller samples than are currently used for clinical evaluation. CTCs are enriched without bias as to their surface antigen expression, and are not labeled with antibodies prior to detection. CTCs can be stained and visualized directly on the microfluidic chip. This unbiased enrichment approach could be used to assess the mutation status of CTC in real time. Citation Format: Carrie E. Peters, Hamizah Ahmad, Drew Kellerman, Bhuvanendran Nair Gourikutty Sajay, Chang Chia-Pin, Wong Chee Chung, Abdur Rub Abdur Rahman, Karina L. McQueen, Terry E. Thomas. Microfluidic-based unbiased enrichment (negative selection) of circulating non-hematopoietic tumor cells directly from whole blood without centrifugation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1451. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-1451
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».