International NGOs and the Aid Industry: constraints on international solidarity
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1 A comprehensive presentation can be found in I Smillie, The Alms Bazaar: Altruism under Fire, Non-profit Organisations and International Development, Ottawa: idrc, 1995. 2 F Manji, 'The depoliticisation of poverty', in Manji , Development and Rights, Oxford: Oxfam GB, 1998, p 13. 3 Ibid, p 17. 4 Ibid, p 28. 5 Ibid, p 25. 6 From personal conversations, meetings and conferences 1995–2005. 7 See A Bebbington, S Hickey & D Mitlin, Reclaiming Development? NGO s and the Challenge of Alternatives, idpm, School of Environment and Development, University of Manchester, May 2005. 'Notwithstanding the efforts of many to use poverty as a means of discussing politics, the tendency is still towards a narrow definition and reducing income poverty still remains the central goal—reflected in its position as the first mdg…While it is hard to contest the worthiness of such goals, this emphasis has the potential not only to rein in but also depoliticise the range of strategies open to ngos in promoting development. There is at least some evidence that the demands for poverty reduction are affecting: the types of social organisations that ngos work with (with shifts to production and credit groups and away from representative social movements); the types of intervention such ngos engage in and support, with a tendency to seek poverty reduction impacts rather than redistributing effects; the regions of the world for which ngos can mobilise funding; and the languages and discourse within which development debates can be couched' (p 13). 8 See, for example, T Wallace, 'ngo dilemmas: Trojan Horses for global neoliberalism?', in L Panitch & C Leys (eds), The New Imperial Challenge: Socialist Register, London: Merlin Press, 2004, pp 202–219; J Howell & J Pearce, Civil Society and Development: A Critical Exploration, London: Lynne Rienner, 2002; P Bond, 'Global governance campaigning and mdgs: from top-down to bottom-up anti-poverty work', Third World Quarterly, 27(2), 2006, pp 339–354; A Van Rooy, Civil Society and the Aid Industry, London: Earthscan, 1998; B Murphy, 'International ngos and the challenge of modernity', Development in Practice, 10(3–4), 2000; Smillie, The Alms Bazaar; Manji, 'The depoliticisation of poverty'; Bebbington et al, Reclaiming Development?; and BH Smith, 'Nonprofit organisations in international development: agents of empowerment or preservers of stability?', in WW Powell & ES Clemons (eds), Private Action and the Public Good, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988. 9 Bebbington et al, Reclaiming Development?, p 3. 10 See D Sogge, Give and Take: What's Wrong with Foreign Aid?, London: Zed Books, 2002. 11 M Atwood, The Blind Assassin, Toronto: M&S, 2000, p 12. 12 A Escobar, Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995, p 52. 13 Ibid, p 39. 14 See J Pender, 'From "structural adjustment" to "comprehensive development framework": conditionality transformed?', Third World Quarterly, 22(3), 2001, pp 397–411. 15 For full text and background on the Paris Declaration, see http://www.oecd.org/document/18/0,2340,en_2649_3236398_35401554_1_1_1_1,00.html, accessed 15 January 2013. 16 Structural Adjustment: The sapri Report—Policy Roots of Economic Crisis, Poverty and Inequality by the Structural Adjustment Participatory Review International Network ( saprin ), London: Zed, 2004. 17 Ibid, p 222. 18 L Attarah, 'Playing chicken: Ghana vs the imf', Corpwatch, 2005, at http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=12394, accessed 14 January 2013. 19 R Abrahamsen, 'African Studies and the post-colonial challenge', African Affairs, 102, 2003, p 203. See also R Abrahamsen, Disciplining Democracy: Development Discourse and Good Governance in Africa, London: Zed Books, 2000. Emphasis in the original. 20 D Tsikata, 'Social scientists and Africa's future: towards alternative agendas, new alliances and a passion for democracy, economic justice and social development', codesria Bulletin, 3–4, 2005, p 56.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».