MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2010289922 · doi:10.1353/cwh.2000.0021

A War of the People: Vermont Civil War Letters (review)

2000· article· en· W2010289922 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Sherman

Notice bibliographique

RevueCivil War history · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueAmerican History and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNewspaperSpanish Civil WarHistoryDutyBattlefieldLawMedia studiesPolitical scienceSociologyAncient history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BOOK REVIEWS69 the Chattahoochie [sic] River, September 4, 1864" (245), Fleharty announces the fall ofthe Southern bastion to the victorious national armies commanded by William T. Sherman. Then quite abruptly, with the apparent close of the campaign , he concluded his series of letters and stopped writing to the newspapers. Fleharty informed his readers that his reasons to discontinue his war dispatches were "weighty and most decidedly confidential" (246). The decision to quit sending newspaper dispatches, however, did not end Fleharty's war experiences, for he continued to serve faithfully to the conclusion of the war, marching with Sherman to the Sea and in the advance through the Carolinas. A number of the impressions Fleharty recorded about the final western campaigns, provided in a number of personal letters, are incorporated by the editors in their detailed and generous introduction. Jottings From Dixie provides a welcome study of Fleharty's entire life— from prewar through postwar experiences. The press dispatches illustrate a remarkably open and perceptive mind. Beyond thoughtful accounts ofregimental activities, Fleharty often informed his readers about the natural history and historic sites of the South—such as a personal investigation of the Stones River battlefield—he took the opportunity to visit when off duty. Extremely Uterate, the descriptions arid insights into soldiering during the turbulent years of civil war are clearly written and helped reveal to his audience a people and a society most of them would never have the opportunity to experience. In recent years, more and more historians have become aware of the great value of wartime letters to newspapers in helping our generation understand the Civil War. The collection of soldier-correspondent letters by Sgt. Maj. Stephen F. Fleharty provides a compelling and interesting narrative ofthe daily challenges facing the common Civil War soldier. It is unfortunate that the young man chose to quit his soldier-correspondent duties with the fall ofAtlanta—but who are we to judge such a personal decision? Rather, the reader should consider it most fortunate that the provocative impressions this entertaining Illinois soldier deemed important to record have finaUy been published for the enjoyment of future generations. Stacy D. Allen Shiloh National Military Park A War ofthe People: Vermont Civil War Letters. Edited by Jeffrey D. Marshall. (Hanover, N.H.: University Press ofNew England, 1999. Pp. xviü, 357. $25.00 paper.) Writing to his son, William Jr., on July 29, 1861, William Young Ripley of Rutland, Vermont, reflected on the results and significance of the first Battle of Bull Run. "This is a war of the people, and the men at Washington—will find that they are only agents int he matter" (40). Jeffrey D. Marshall, university archivist and curator of manuscripts at the University of Vermont, has taken his 70CIVIL WAR HISTORY title and his cues from Ripley's letter. This volume includes over 140 carefully selected letters from Vermont soldiers of every rank and civilians of every economic and social class. Marshall foUows the Civil War from its earliest days through the beginnings of the disbanding of the Union army in June 1865. He drew his sources from an estimated nine thousand extant letters in ten public research institutions and three private collections. Correspondents include Vermont soldiers and officers in the infantry, cavalry , and artillery, musicians, one of the 150 Vermont African American soldiers , a French Canadian who enlisted in a Vermont regiment, chaplains, the parents, siblings, wives, and friends ofsoldiers. The soldiers write on the march, sometimes using a cartridge case or saddle as a writing desk, and form tents and barracks. They write to say that they have survived; to express optimism, discouragement , patriotism, piety, and occasionally their prejudices. They describe details and sometimes the seamier sides of camp life and the dehumanizing viciousness of soldiering. They recount their experiences in battles, comment on what they read in newspapers or letters from home, and quell or report rumors . Often they reveal how little they themselves know of what is happening or has happened in the events in which they participate. They write to request boxes ofprovisions, occasionally to request bottles of Uquor that they can sell at great profit, and most of all to request letters from home...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,720
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,990

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,168
Écart entre enseignants0,160 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCivil War historyMême sujetAmerican History and CultureTravaux en français237 207