MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2010319607 · doi:10.1086/315637

Collaborative Multidisciplinary Workshop Report: What Questions Regarding the Role of<i>Chlamydia pneumoniae</i>in Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Disease Need to Be Addressed Utilizing Animal Models?

2000· article· en· W2010319607 sur OpenAlexaff
I. W. Fong, Thomas C. Quinn, Erwin Blessing, Cho‐Chou Kuo, Raffaele Malinverni, Michael S. Lauer, Steven D. Mawhorter, Kurt Bachmaier, Michael E. Rosenfeld, Christopher L. Taylor, Guangming Zhong

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineVeterinary
ThématiqueBrucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of TorontoAmgen (Canada)St. Michael's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChlamydiaDiseaseMultidisciplinary approachChlamydophila pneumoniaeAnimal modelMedicineIntensive care medicineChlamydialesImmunologyPathologyInternal medicinePolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In general, the Animal Model Workshop Committee concluded that animal models are crucial to investigations of the role of Chlamydia pneumoniae in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. In vivo animal experiments are essential in studies to establish causality between C. pneumoniae and atherosclerosis; however, it is unlikely that an animal model will fulfill all the criteria of Koch's postulate, which was developed for an acute infectious disease with a single etiology, because atherosclerosis is a chronic disease with multiple etiologic factors. Furthermore, animal models are necessary to discern the possible mechanisms by which C. pneumoniae may induce, accelerate, or complicate the processes of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Experiments are necessary to complement in vitro and human studies in establishing biological plausibility. The establishment of animal models should be a priority to provide guidelines for clinical trials with respect to appropriate interventions and prevention (e.g., guidelines for the most appropriate antimicrobial agent or combination of agents, dose and duration of therapy, and development of a possible vaccine). There is no perfect or ideal animal model that would mimic all parameters of human atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. In the animal kingdom, nonhuman primates are closest to humans, but atherosclerotic changes are not exactly the same in nonhuman and human primates. Moreover, there are disadvantages to using a primate model, primary among which are the cost, the lack of availability to many investigators, and the public's opposition to use of primates in experiments. Although it was felt by the committee that a primate model would provide useful information, it was not considered absolutely necessary for establishing causality. Although rabbits and mice have been the main animals used to investigate the relationship between C. pneumoniae and atherosclerosis, preliminary data on the mini-pig model were presented at this meeting. Each animal model has its own advantages and disadvantages, which will not be addressed in this communication. Atherosclerotic changes in mini-pigs closely resemble those in humans, and coronary artery disease can be studied in the animal; therefore, the model should be useful even though the size of the mini-pig (30 kg) is still a limiting factor for relatively large treatment studies. Recent recognition of a new Chlamydia species that is endemic in pigs (Chlamydia suis, swine biovar of Chlamydia trachomatis) may pose a problem; however, it also could be an advantage in that this species could be studied in swine as a surrogate for C. pneumoniae or as a control infection. New noninvasive techniques to detect coronary artery disease or atherosclerosis, such as B-mode Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, could be applied to these mini-pigs and allow smaller sample sizes. Members of the committee concluded that multiple animal models are needed to answer different questions, and if several different animals can demonstrate atherosclerotic changes with C. pneumoniae infection, then we would be closer to establishing causality. On the basis of their discussions, committee members made the following observations and recommendations regarding the use of animal models in the study of the role of C. pneumoniae in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease: One of the limitations of the animal studies reported so far is the inability to recover viable C. pneumoniae from aorta or atheromatous tissues in chronic infection models (but it can be recovered in the aorta during acute infection in the mouse model), although the organism can be demonstrated by immunohistochemical stains and polymerase chain reaction. Studies should be done to address this issue, even though it is recognized that the organism may reside in tissues in a latent, metabolically inactive, persistent state. Utilization of corticosteroids several days or weeks before sacrifice or inhibition of γ-interferon (by monoclonal antibodies) are measures that should be considered as they may induce reactivation or proliferation of the organism. The animal models so far have been relatively short-term and have demonstrated mild, early, atherosclerotic lesions, although more diffuse macroscopic lesions can be seen when a cholesterol-enriched diet is added. Longer-term studies are needed to define the natural history (in terms of years) of the arteriopathy and to determine whether it is feasible to produce stenotic lesions or vulnerable plaques, which may have more clinical application. Multiple risk factors have been associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. It is likely these cofactors have additive or synergistic effects on the development or progression of atherosclerosis. So far, C. pneumoniae have been demonstrated to accelerate atherosclerosis in the rabbit and murine model in the presence of hypercholesterolemia. Further animal studies are needed to explore the interaction of C. pneumoniae infection with other established risk factors (e.g., smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus) and newly recognized cofactors, such as hyperhomocystinemia. Other infectious diseases (cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, periodontitis and Helicobacter pylori) have been associated with cardiovascular disease in humans, and the effect of coinfections with C. pneumoniae and one or more agents should be explored and compared with the effect of C. pneumoniae alone in animal models. Other microbial agents not associated with cardiovascular disease should be used as controls in these models to assess nonspecific effect. To date, organisms used as controls in animal studies include C. trachomatis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Pasturella multocida. Neither C. trachomatis nor M. pneumoniae have been found to induce or enhance atherosclerosis in animal models, but P. multocida can accelerate the atherosclerotic changes induced by a cholesterol-enriched diet in the rabbit. The implications of an infectious disease playing a major role in cardiovascular disease are enormous. Large-scale clinical trials have already been started with the newer macrolides to determine their efficacy in reducing secondary cardiovascular events. Animal models are important for providing guidelines concerning the most effective antimicrobial agent or combination of agents (especially with rifampin) as well as the optimaldose and the duration of therapy to be used in clinical trials. Studies in animals should also examine the benefit(s) of using antibiotics combined with a lipid-lowering agent (“statins”), antioxidants (e.g., vitamin E), or anti-inflammatory agents. The ultimate strategy to prevent cardiovascular disease, besides alteration of lifestyle, would be to develop a vaccine. Animal models are crucial for testing the efficacy and safety of a vaccine before clinical trials. The primary objective of a vaccine program would likely be to prevent respiratory disease, with a secondary aim of also reducing atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Primary prevention and secondary prevention studies could be conducted in different animal models. The potential of a therapeutic vaccine (after establishing infection) with and without antibiotics should be explored. The possibility of a vaccine inducing myocarditis or worsening vascular damage needs to be rigorously examined in animal models. In many aspects, animal models are crucial to our understanding the role of C. pneumoniae in the development or progression of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. The members of the workshop committee strongly urge governmental and other funding agencies and pharmaceutical companies to support these important and essential animal studies. In addition, animal studies regarding causality between C. pneumoniae and atherosclerosis and the mechanisms would be facilitated and earlier answers would be enabled if a central resource was established to provide early information to investigators on the availability of new transgenic animals and investigative and diagnostic tools.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,033
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,033
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,172

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0330,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0030,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0150,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,042
Tête enseignante GPT0,310
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesMême sujetBrucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatmentTravaux en français237 207