MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2010463388 · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.89b7.19972

Blood and urine metal ion levels in young and active patients after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty

2007· letter· en· W2010463388 sur OpenAlexaff
Pascal‐André Vendittoli, Muthu Ganapathi, Martin Lavigne

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume · 2007
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Établissements canadiensHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHip resurfacingMedicineUrineCohortAudience measurementHip arthroplastySurgeryProspective cohort studyTotal hip arthroplastyArthroplastyInternal medicineAdvertising

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volumeVol. 89-B, No. 7 CorrespondenceFree AccessBlood and urine metal ion levels in young and active patients after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplastyP-A. VENDITTOLI, M. GANAPATHI, M. LAVIGNEP-A. VENDITTOLIAssistant Professor of SurgerySearch for more papers by this author, M. GANAPATHISearch for more papers by this author, M. LAVIGNESearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:1 Jul 2007https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19972AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsAdd to Favourites ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Sir,We read with interest the paper by Daniel et al1 entitled “Blood and urine metal ions levels in young and active patients after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: four-year results of a prospective longitudinal study.” This paper presents the pre- and post-operative metal ion measurements of 26 patients who have undergone Birmingham Hip Resurfacing with 50 mm or 54 mm femoral components. While we acknowledge the science behind the measurement method used by the authors (urine and whole blood with HR-ICPMS), we would be interested in the authors’ comments regarding the following issues.It is unclear to the readership whether or not this cohort of 26 patients is representative of the entire cohort of patients who received metal ion analyses. If this is a subset which only involves 50 mm and 54 mm femoral components then this may not be representative and should not be considered as a baseline upon which other metal ion studies should reference themselves for comparative purposes. In selecting only 50 mm and 54 mm components they have probably included mainly, if not exclusively, men. Gender ratio is not reported in the paper. Women will very rarely need these implant sizes.Gender and bearing diameter have a significant impact on patients’ metal ion levels. Recently, we reported chromium and cobalt ion levels with the Durom (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) in whole blood.2 Our mean chromium and cobalt levels in whole blood for the whole group (men and women, all sizes) was 1.6 μg/L of chromium and 0.7 μg/L of cobalt. When splitting the group by gender, mean levels at one year were lower in men: 1.5 μg/ L versus 1.9 μg/L for chromium and 0.6 μg/L versus 0.8 μg/L for cobalt (p = 0.05).Using a similar selection process as Daniel et al1 in their paper (limiting the results to 50 mm and 54 mm femoral components), the mean metal ion levels in our patients (24 men and 1 woman) were 1.4 μg/L of chromium and 0.6 μg/L of cobalt in whole blood at one year (25% reduction versus our whole cohort results). As a comparison, Daniel et al1 reported 2.4 μg/L of chromium and 1.3 μg/L of cobalt with the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing.As the study was a prospective study where pre-operative whole blood was collected (before the implant size was known) they could have reported the results of the whole cohort (all implant sizes). By doing so, they could have provided the readers a real baseline for further comparison.While assessing the performance of a new implant or technique, the results should be presented for the whole cohort where the innovation will be used. In the case of hip resurfacing, males and females with good femoral bone stock, significant life expectancy, no metal allergy, unimpaired renal function, and with suitable anatomy for the procedure, are examples. Selecting subgroups based on diagnosis, implant size, or gender may not reflect the real performance of the device or technique. Hence we feel that the authors’ conclusion that their results provide a baseline for comparison with other implants is not justified. For the moment, we can only use their data for comparison with patients with similar component diameters (50 mm and 54 mm). References 1 Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW. Blood and urine metal ion levels in young and active patients after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: four-year results of a prospective longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:169–73. Link, Google Scholar2 Vendittoli PA, Mottard S, Roy AG, Dupont C, Lavigne M. Chromium and cobalt ion release following the Durom high carbon content, forged metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:441–8. Link, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byChanges in blood ion levels after removal of metal-on-metal hip replacements23 April 2014 | Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 85, No. 3Catastrophic failure due to massive osteolysis of both acetabular and femoral components in a metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a demonstrative case report16 October 2012 | European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, Vol. 23, No. S2High doses of cobalt induce optic and auditory neuropathyExperimental and Toxicologic Pathology, Vol. 65, No. 6Neurotoxicity of cobalt5 July 2011 | Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 31, No. 5In vivo evaluation of edge-loading in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients with pseudotumoursY-M. Kwon, S. J. Mellon, P. Monk, D. W. Murray, H. S. Gill5 April 2012 | Bone & Joint Research, Vol. 1, No. 4The influence of Co-Cr and UHMWPE particles on infection persistence: An in vivo study in mice22 August 2011 | Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Vol. 30, No. 3The Role of Albumin in Human Toxicology of Cobalt: Contribution from a Clinical CaseISRN Hematology, Vol. 2011Metal ion levels following resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip SERIAL RESULTS OVER A TEN-YEAR PERIODR. M. deSouza, N. R. Parsons, T. Oni, P. Dalton, M. Costa, S. Krikler1 December 2010 | The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, Vol. 92-B, No. 12Effects of metal-on-metal wear on the host immune system and infection in hip arthroplasty22 September 2010 | Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 81, No. 5Hip Resurfacing for the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the HipOrthopedics, Vol. 31, No. 12Cup Inclination Angle of Greater than 50 Degrees Increases whole Blood Concentrations of Cobalt and Chromium ions after Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing24 January 2018 | HIP International, Vol. 18, No. 3 Vol. 89-B, No. 7 Metrics History Published online 1 July 2007 Published in print 1 July 2007 InformationCopyright © 2007, The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery: All rights reservedPDF download

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,220
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British VolumeMême sujetOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyTravaux en français237 207