MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2010565304 · doi:10.1353/utq.2005.0230

The Road of Excess: A History of Writers on Drugs (review)

2004· article· en· W2010565304 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
John V. Walker

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMusic History and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAsidePower (physics)HistorySkepticismLiteratureTheme (computing)PraxisClassicsAestheticsArt historyLawArtPhilosophyTheologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: In the Houses of the Holy: Led Zeppelin and the Power of Rock Music John V. Walker (bio) Susan Fast. In the Houses of the Holy: Led Zeppelin and the Power of Rock Music Oxford University Press 2001. vii, 248. $22.00 The prologue of Marcus Boon's The Road of Excess: A History of Writers on Drugs, aside from violating the unwritten law that the PhD candidate's tortuous attempt to justify his topic to a sceptical committee be either revised or dropped entirely when the work is published in book form, is fascinating for its nervous recognition that when it comes to the topic of drugs in an academic setting, to paraphrase Catharine MacKinnon, to write it is to do it. 'In the process of writing this book I have been asked numerous times how much "research" I have done,' an exasperated Boon writes. 'To read a book about drugs, to write about books about drugs, is evidently a [End Page 605] sign that one has been exposed to something, and possibly contaminated by it. I don't deny that this may be the case. But - exposed to what?' What indeed? For all the mantra-like repetition of terms like 'transgression' and 'revolution' emanating from the ranks of academe in the last two decades, the contemporary university remains a remarkably conservative place, nearly as concerned with conformity, especially in the realm of personal 'praxis,' as your garden-variety corporation. Radical theory is one thing, but radical behaviour is another, and the English professor as junkie is an idea whose time has not yet arrived. Ironically, however, the slightly offensive question constantly asked of Boon regarding the interrelationship of writing and chemical 'contamination' in his own life also partly informs his theoretical approach in The Road of Excess. Most valuable here is the interrogation not only of the usual suspects (Thomas De Quincey, William Burroughs) but also of lesser-known figures in the 'secret history' of drug literature, including the German poet and opium user Novalis, who 'believed in the possibility of exploring' the inner realm of the imagination as invoked by narcotic usage, and in 'bringing back data from that realm.' While this quintessentially Romantic quest - in which the 'sickness' of the user functions as a 'critique' of 'normal' society - doesn't always end up well (Boon conjures 'the peculiar stench of abandoned, decaying bodies leaving hardly a trace of any discovered light' when describing the destiny of French playwright and drug enthusiast Antonin Artaud and his disciples), it nevertheless informs the lives and works of most of the literary figures, both obscure and well-known, historical and contemporary, who seriously pursue drug use of whatever stripe (chemist and writer Alexander Shulgin, for instance, claims to 'gaze upon the entire universe' after smoking a hundred milligrams of the psychedelic DMT). What ultimately emerges here, from separate chapters on narcotics, anaesthetics, cannabis, stimulants, and psychedelics, is an overall theme (though Boon doesn't identify it as such) of drugs as a vehicle for the attainment of personal sovereignty, a tool for the transforming of the self through chemical means. Drugs, however, are only half of the equation: literature itself also functions as a mind-altering substance capable of affecting the consciousness of its users. For the gutter-dandy Jean Cocteau, opium becomes a potent literary symbol, 'one of the props ... used in the staging of his own identity'; Charles Baudelaire and others of his ilk, meanwhile, delight in the 'evil' role of literary pushers, as writing about vice becomes yet another form of vice, a way to 'consciously aestheticize self-destruction,' enticing and corrupting the complacent, repressed bourgeois masses. Obviously not ready to join Plato in his call to ban the poets (or the drug users) from the ideal society, the author of The Road of Excess, in answering the query whether he inhaled, does provide a few hints that he is, to quote [End Page 606] the old Merry Pranksters' motto, 'on the bus.' Speaking of the 'features of extension, elaboration of, and digression from an idea' typical of amphetamine-using writers such as Jean-Paul Sartre and Jack Kerouac, Boon suddenly enters his own text...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,031

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0070,011
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0060,006
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,175
Écart entre enseignants0,163 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Même sujetMusic History and Culture→Travaux en français237 207→