MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2011489787 · doi:10.1353/tt.2015.0000

Introduction: Reflections on DREAM Acts—Performance as Refuge, Resistance, and Renewal: ATHE Conference, Scottsdale, Arizona, 24–27 July 2014

2015· article· en· W2011489787 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sonja Arsham Kuftinec

Notice bibliographique

RevueTheatre topics · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésResistance (ecology)LegislationVisionDreamDissentPolitical scienceLegislaturePoliticsMedia studiesLawSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction:Reflections on DREAM Acts—Performance as Refuge, Resistance, and Renewal: ATHE Conference, Scottsdale, Arizona, 24–27 July 2014 Sonja Arsham Kuftinec (bio) Annual ATHE convenings can have the feel of contemporary nomadism. I have awoken in curtained bedrooms or paused in well-appointed lobbies wracking my brains to recall whether I was in San Francisco, Denver, or Dallas. We flow through such hauntingly similar hotel spaces that we can become ungrounded by location. ATHE conference vice presidents have worked to counter this sense of what cultural theorist Zygmunt Bauman has characterized as “liquid modernity” with, for example, offsite play dates in Orlando or inhouse playwrights in Toronto. Yet, our comfortable base locations have on occasion provoked productive discomfort—about hotel unionization in San Francisco, or Stand Your Ground legislation in Florida. While no site is unburdened by historical or legislative complexities, our chosen location in Arizona provoked more visible dissent, more profound questions, and more forcefully stated proposals to boycott the conference in the face of the state’s discriminatory legislation. Guided by advisement from ATHE members local to Arizona, the conference committee chose to grapple directly with these contentious issues: to amplify on-the-ground resistance, to frame many Arizonas, and to offer alternative visions that exceeded legislative proposals. Our conference theme—DREAM Acts—referenced specific political legislation around higher education opportunities for undocumented immigrant youth, as well as the capacious possibilities for theatre to activate alternative imaginaries: to serve as a space of refuge, as well as a site of resistance and resilience. Thus, we wanted the conference to explore our dreams for the future of ATHE through the vexed politics and poetics of the here and now (and then) in Arizona. Site-specific performances invited us to be conscious about the resource of water in the hotel space, travel the region attending to its hidden stories, and engage in intimate acts through the reading of banned plays. The Latino/Latina Focus Group hosted an altera where ATHE members could read aloud excerpts of plays banned when Tucson’s Mexican studies program was legislatively disbanded. Additionally, we felt that the keynote and plenary sessions could offer the most sustained opportunities to address theatre’s potential in moments of crisis. Our keynote speaker was chosen to highlight the work of a regional artist-activist. In conversation with interlocutor Tiffany Ana López, playwright and professor Luis Alfaro inspired us to consider theatre as a space to enact our citizenship and engage disparate audiences. Within the educational realm he celebrated artistic discipline, as well as bureaucratic subversion in the service of crafting the stories we need to tell. Excerpts from the hour-long conversation between professors Lopez and Alfaro appear later in this issue. Our conference committee also came to view Arizona as a staging ground for broader field concerns, particularly around our pedagogical mandate. Thus, our plenary panel proposed an [End Page 1] alternative direction for dreaming than that aligned with westward expansion, starting from the Indigenous perspectives and on-the-ground activism in Arizona and moving through broader educational concerns. The plenary bridged locally specific activists and artists with a national imperative for responsive pedagogy in higher education. Backed by two films created by Efrain Robles replete with haunting images of the Arizona desert as crossing, we opened with provocative performance poetry by local artist Tomás Stanton. The panel also included a performance from local artist and DREAM activist Dulce Juarez, as well as meditations from Tucson’s Borderlands Theater artistic director Barclay Goldsmith on the theatre’s decades-long sustainability. The plenary also invited comments from Tucson professor Raquel Rubio, who unfortunately was unable to attend. The written comments of three additional plenarists follow. Arizona State University professor Tamara Underiner sets the frame for the session, welcoming us to and complicating the space of Arizona. Catherine Cole of the University of California, Berkeley offers perspectives on the institutional challenges we face in attracting and serving a new generation of artists and thinkers. ATHE’s president-elect and Brown University professor Patricia Ybarra closed the panel with a response that tied back to the initial urge to boycott the conference, which she herself had admittedly felt...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,104
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,348

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,003
Communication savante0,0060,002
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1040,020

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,322
Écart entre enseignants0,279 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTheatre topicsMême sujetMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationTravaux en français237 207