MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2011706176 · doi:10.1097/01.mat.0000182209.17907.14

First International Conference on Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support Systems and Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Perfusion

2005· article· en· W2011706176 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gerson Rosenberg, William S. Pierce, Stephen E. Cyran, John A. Waldhausen

Notice bibliographique

RevueASAIO Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCardiopulmonary bypassMedical emergencyIntensive care medicineCardiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The First International Conference on Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support Systems and Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Perfusion was held at the Hotel Hershey, Hershey, Pennsylvania, on May 19–22, 2005. Over 300 participants from 20 different countries including Argentina, Brazil, Belgium, Canada, Chile, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Kuwait, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland, South Korea, Taiwan, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States were in attendance. The primary goal of this meeting was to bring together internationally known clinicians, basic scientists, and engineers involved in research on pediatric mechanical circulatory support systems and pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass procedures to precisely define the problems with current techniques and devices and to suggest short-term and long-term solutions. This conference had three phases. First Phase Investigators gave summaries of current devices and techniques used during pediatric mechanical circulatory support and cardiopulmonary perfusion around the globe. Limitations and complications associated with current systems were described in detail. The results of direct comparisons of many different devices and techniques were discussed. Second Phase Newly developed devices at clinical and preclinical stage were described in detail. There were presentations that compared alternate and conventional treatments and devices used during acute or long-term cardiac support. Third Phase This phase was the establishment of a permanent record of all presentations. This issue of the ASAIO Journal is dedicated to our conference. All manuscripts were peer-reviewed and published as a block in the ASAIO Journal. In addition, all of the abstracts from our keynote and invited speakers, as well as the abstracts from the slide and poster presenters, were placed on the conference web page (http://www.hmc.psu.edu/ce/pediatrics). This allows anyone from anywhere around the globe to easily access this information. We received endorsements from prominent societies and significant financial support from numerous institutions. The following societies have endorsed this international event: the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, the Asian Pacific Society for Circulatory Support, the Biomedical Engineering Society, the European Society for Artificial Organs, the International Federation for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, the Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, and the Society of Turkish Cardiovascular Surgery. Significant financial support was received from Penn State Children’s Hospital, Penn State College of Medicine, and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. This support played a key role in allowing us to organize this conference. The Whitaker Foundation also provided support to allow over 20 biomedical engineers and students to attend this event. The following manufacturers made educational grants to our conference: Arrow International, Berlin Heart AG, DataScope Corp., Maquet, Inc., MEDOS Medizintechnik AG, MicroMed Technology, Inc., Somanetics Corporation, St. Jude Medical, and Thoratec Corporation. In addition, without the help of the Penn State University, Department of Continuing Medical Education, this event would not have been possible. We appreciate the assistance we received from Ms. Bonnie Bixler, Ms. Tracy Allgier-Baker, and others from Ms. Bixler’s staff. We are humbled with the response and compliments we received during the past year while we were organizing this unique event. Without the participation of dozens of leading invited and keynote lecturers, this conference would not have created such a tremendous amount of interest. This conference will be held annually as long as there is a need. We have already scheduled the second conference in Istanbul, Turkey, May 17–20, 2006, and the third conference in Hawaii, May 16–19, 2007. We hope that this conference will be a positive force for future collaborations among physicians, scientists, and engineers in this important but neglected field. If the course of just one child is improved as a result of this event, we would consider our goal to have been reached. Finally, we sincerely thank Dr. Jay Zwischenberger, Editor of the ASAIO Journal, and Betty L. Littleton, Managing Editor, for not only dedicating one issue of the journal to our manuscripts, but also publishing them in a record time of 3 months. Acknowledgments This article was extracted from Dr. Ündar’s earlier publication in the Proceedings of the First International Conference on Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support Systems and Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Perfusion, Volume 1, May 2005.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,039
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,129

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0390,014

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueASAIO JournalMême sujetMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesTravaux en français237 207