MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2012254296 · doi:10.1080/00085006.2015.1035028

The Soviet theater: a documentary history

2015· article· en· W2012254296 sur OpenAlexaffvenue
Irena R. Makaryk

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSoviet and Russian History
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDocumentary evidenceDocumentary filmHistoryVisual artsPolitical scienceArtArt historyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Soviet theater: a documentary history, edited by Laurence Senelick and Sergei Ostrovsky, New Haven CT and London, Yale University Press, 2014, xxiii + 754 pp., US$125.00 (hbk), ISBN 978-0-300-19476-0Laurence Senelick and Sergei Ostrovsky have produced an essential, welcome, and muchneeded sourcebook for all scholars - young or grizzled - studying Soviet, especially Russian, theatre. In a task that has taken 20 years, Senelick and Ostrovsky have followed an extensive paper trail. Happily, they have chosen to mimic their subject and, like the Soviet government, interpreted the concept of document in the widest possible sense; thus, they include not only official records, decrees, and other pronouncements, but also protocols, minutes of meetings, excerpts from memoirs, diaries, letters, reviews (occasionally foreign, as well as Soviet), and criticism, in addition to the occasionally quoted passages from plays and satires. This widely cast net has brought home great riches culled from the libraries and archives of the Russian Federation, the United States, and Israel. History comes alive with a multiplicity of voices and opinions: enthusiastic, admonitory, anxious, fearful, officious, declamatory, satiric. Together, these documents are witnesses to the constantly shifting, volatile, and often dangerous, commingled terrain of art and politics in the Soviet period.Indeed, the authors forcefully and necessarily emphasize the complete interconnections of art and politics throughout the whole Soviet period, from the heady days of experimentation through repression to the descent into stagnation. This tome thus provides a necessary corrective to the many English-language books and articles that focus on individuals and fail to recognize the inescapable embeddedness of culture in the politics of the period. As the authors insist in their preface:We are not dealing with independent artists creating in a vacuum, nor even with theater folk responding to the tastes of an audience. Art for art's sake plays no role here. In the USSR, almost from the first, the theater is, in one way or another, a reflection of the government's mood. How theater is to serve society is dictated from above: one may oppose that diktat or find idiosyncratic ways to serve it, but it cannot be avoided, (xi)In the introduction, they reiterate the fact that between 1917 and 1992 politics infused all theatres, traditional or experimental, Party dictated or dissenting, amateur or professional; yet, astonishingly, many extraordinary accomplishments saw the light of day (6).Written with verve and wit, the introduction lays out in a clear, lucid, and concise manner the histoiy of theatre in Russia, beginning with its late arrival in the nineteenth century, its hierarchical structure, and - most significantly - its ardent embrace of moral-ethical imperatives. More than just an entertainment, theatre was to offer moral and spiritual sustenance. This tradition of theatre as a service industry was adopted in the Soviet period, when its arsenal was, above all, to be deployed in serving the ends of socialism and communism. Other carryovers from the tsarist period were the systems of control and censorship, honed and perfected into efficiency by the Bolsheviks. Not simply prohibiting what was harmful, as did their tsarist forebears, the Bolsheviks also went further by prescribing what was wholesome for the community (7).The book is logically divided into 11 chapters corresponding to the generally accepted periodization of Soviet history, each prefaced by a succinct and incisive mini introduction: The Revolution, 1917-1919; The Civil War, 1919-1921; The New Economic Policy, 1921-1926; Stalin Consolidates Power, 1926-1927; The First Five-Year Plan, 1928-1932; The Second Five-Year Plan and the Great Terror, 1933-1938; The Great Patriotic War, 1939-1945; The Cold War Begins, 1946-1953; The So-called Thaw and the Refrigeration, 1954-1963; Innovation within Stagnation, 1964-1984; Glasnost' and Perestroika, 1985-1992. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,907
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Slavonic PapersMême sujetSoviet and Russian HistoryTravaux en français237 207