Performance characteristics and economic comparison of broiler chickens fed wheat- and triticale-based diets
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The effects of triticale and wheat on broiler (mixed sexes) performance and cost of production were compared. In experiment 1, wheat- and triticale-based diets were fed to 3 strains of broilers (Ross x Ross, Hubbard x Hubbard, and Ross x Hubbard). Each of the diets was provided to 5 cages/strain (n = 10 chicks/cage; 1,273 cm2/bird). Weekly BW, gain, feed consumption, and feed conversion ratio (FCR; g of feed/g of gain) were determined. At 42 d, 4 chicks/pen were shipped to a commercial processing plant. The plucked, eviscerated carcasses were evaluated for carcass traits. Overall, the triticale-fed birds had lower final BW and average daily gain and higher FCR. Eviscerated carcass, thigh, and drum weights were lower, but pectoralis minor as a percentage of carcass weight was greater in triticale-fed birds. In experiment 2, a wheat diet and a diet in which triticale was substituted (by weight) for wheat were provided in a 3-phase feeding program. Each diet was provided to 2 identically-equipped commercial barns housing 17,034 broilers each. Individual BW of a sample of birds were recorded in each barn at 0, 19, 34, and 42 d, corresponding to the beginning and end of each dietary phase. Feed consumption and FCR were calculated for each barn. An analysis of each of the diets was calculated using a broiler chicken production cost model. Final BW, feed consumption, carcass weight at processing, flock uniformity, percentage of Grade A carcasses, and percentage of condemned carcasses were not affected by cereal source. Overall FCR (2.165, 2.036; P = 0.0052), feed cost (dollars 0.617, dollars 0.577/kg live weight; P = 0.0260), and total cost of production (dollars 1.019, dollars 0.972/kg live weight; P = 0.0183) were greater for the triticale than wheat diets, respectively. Triticale would be an economically feasible replacement for wheat in broiler diets when its price is less than or equal to 95% of the cost of wheat, less dollars 18 (Canadian). Increased knowledge of the available nutrient profile of triticale, as well as least-cost feed formulation would likely increase the value of triticale relative to wheat for broilers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».