MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2012587172 · doi:10.2118/103269-ms

Alternative Management and Mitigation for Potential Impacts of Oil and Gas Operations in the World's Largest and Most Productive Ecologically Sensitive Site

2006· article· en· W2012587172 sur OpenAlexaff
Ibrahim Khan, M. R. Islam

Notice bibliographique

RevueAll Days · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMangroveThreatened speciesWildlifeHabitatEndangered speciesWetlandEnvironmental scienceWork (physics)Environmental protectionBiodiversityEnvironmental resource managementGeographyFisheryEnvironmental planningEcologyEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Sundarbans mangrove ecosystem, the world largest mangrove forest in Bangladesh, is one of the most productive and biologically diverse wetlands in the world. This unique coastal tropical forest is among the most threatened habitats on earth. Its importance lies in its floristic composition, resource and economic value and precious wildlife reserve. It is a habitat of some 40,000 wildlife species including endangered royal Bengal tigers, rare freshwater dolphins, and crocodiles. It is a nursing and breeding ground of over 340 fish species and 250 bird species and many others. This paper critically examines the present status of the Sundarbans and assesses the potential threat of oil and gas exploration. Every aspect of the exploration and development of oil and gas is analyzed and the magnitude of the impact quantified. In addition detailed guidelines and mitigation plans that will minimize potential impacts are addressed. A case study is done in the Sundarbans mangrove and it shows that by undertaking proper protection and mitigation measures, oil and gas operations can be developed by preserving ecological quality and protecting wildlife. Since there is limited research that focuses on environmentally sensitive areas, this work can serve as a basis for understanding the potential effects and required remediation of oil and gas in an environmentally sensitive ecosystem. The findings of this case study are applicable in any environmentally sensitive area. This work is not intended for use in deciding whether or not to allow oil and gas development in the Sundarbans but rather, to aid in the identification of potential problems, to increase the manager's awareness of the implications of development, and to provide information that may facilitate minimization of harmful effects. Introduction Mangrove ecosystems are one of the most productive and biodiverse wetlands on earth. However, these unique coastal tropical forests are among the most threatened habitats in the world [1]. Due to commercial exploration they may be disappearing more quickly than the island tropical rainforest, and so far, with little public notice [1, 2]. The Sundarbans is the largest single-tract mangrove ecosystem in the world with an area of about 10,000 square kilometers [3]. It contains a large variety of genera and species of plants, wildlife and astonishing biodiversity [4]. It stretches across two countries Bangladesh and India, over the northern part of the Bay of Bengal (see Figures 1 and 2). Due to its great significance the Sundarbans was declared a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve. However, the future of the Sundarbans remains uncertain due to logging, human settlement and other numerous exploitation activities [4]. In order to improve a struggling economy, the Bangladesh government has been looking into using the oil and gas resources in the country. After the recent discovery of huge amount of proven gas reserves in the country, Bangladesh got attention by many multinational oil companies. It is considered that the future of the oil and gas is brighter and its reserves are placed at 15.3 trillion cubic feet (TCF), while the US Geological Survey estimates that Bangladesh contains additional 32.1 TCF "undiscovered reserves" [5]. The most terrestrial and offshore areas of Bangladesh have been divided into twenty three blocks and are gradually being leased to multinational oil and gas companies. The Bangladeshi government recently completed the initial signing of a production sharing contract with two multinational oil giants to begin oil and gas exploration in block number five within the Sundarbans. The companies plan to conduct seismic and aerial surveys. In Bangladesh, the gas and oil exploration business is in its infancy and, therefore, environmental impacts have not yet been felt. However, the impact of hydrocarbon pollution has been clearly reported in many other parts of the world [6, 7, 8, 9]. Oil and gas exploration might pose a new and, for the most part, unknown threat to the Sundarbans ecosystem. There has been a very limited amount of research done so far to determine the effects of oil and gas exploration in mangroves ecosystems except for the preliminary work of [6, 7].

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,692
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,930

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAll DaysMême sujetGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchTravaux en français237 207