MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2012949085 · doi:10.1002/art.38445

A29: Power and Colour Doppler Findings in Lower Extremity Entheses of Healthy Children—Effect of Measurement Distance from Insertion and Joint Position

2014· article· en· W2012949085 sur OpenAlexaff
Johannes Roth, Luca diGeso

Notice bibliographique

RevueArthritis & Rheumatology · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEnthesisMedicineAchilles tendonAnkleTendonUltrasoundPower dopplerPatellaQuadriceps tendonSurgeryRadiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background/Purpose: Musculoskeletal ultrasound has significant potential in the assessment of the pediatric entheses. Doppler signals at the site of tendon insertions are often considered as signs of pathology for enthesitis as well as apophysitis. The normal pediatric enthesis can nevertheless exhibit Doppler signals as well and this might be especially relevant during periods of rapid growth with increased mechanical strain. Limited and partially confliciting data is available for Doppler charactistics of the normal pediatric enthesis. This may be due to technical factors, variable definitions of the anatomic location of the enthesis and variable positioning of the patient. The aim of this study was to examine relevant entheses of the knee and ankle joint in healthy children at the peak of linear growth and determine the effect of measurement distance from the insertion and position of the joint. Methods: 35 males and females with an age range of 11–14 years volunteered for this study. All participants were free of musculoskeletal symptoms, medical conditions or medication affecting the MSK system, MSK injuries in the past three months and did not participate in sports more than three times per week. The Insertion of the Quadriceps tendon into the patella, the proximal and distal patella tendon insertion and the Achilles tendon insertion were examined with standardized settings in Power as well as Colour Doppler Ultrasound using an Esaote Mylab 70 XVG Gold machine with a linear probe ranging from 6 to 18 MHz. Both extremities were assessed in neutral as well as 30 degrees flexion. All images were acquired by a single examiner and read by two readers. A subset of volunteers was reassessed 2 days later. On all images the presence of Doppler signals was assessed directly at the bone/cartilage interface as well as within a distance of 2mm, 5mm and 10mm. Results: No Doppler signals were seen directly at the bone/cartilage surface in any of the enthesis. The highest prevalence of signals was found in the quadriceps tendon. Comparing neutral with 30 degrees flexion 30% vs. 40% of participants displayed Doppler signals within 10 mm of the insertion, 30% vs. 35% within 5 mm and 20% vs. 10% within 2 mm. A similar percentage of Doppler signals was seen within 2 mm of the tibial tuberosity although with 10% of volunteers displaying signals in neutral vs 20% in flexed position. At 10 mm distance these percentages were 30 % in flexed vs 20% in neutral position. In contrast no Doppler signals were seen at the insertion of the proximal Patella tendon and the Achilles tendon. No significant differences were seen between Colour and Power Doppler. Conclusion: The specificity of Doppler findings in Apophysitis or Enthesitis is expected to be much higher in the proximal Patella tendon and Achilles tendon than in other entheses. At all Entheses Doppler signals very close to the bone/cartilage surfaces are rarely observed in healthy children. In contrast, the tendon insertions at the proximal patella and the tibial tuberosity display a high prevalence of Doppler signals at a distance of more than 2 mm from the insertion possibly related to mechanical strain occurring physiologically. In order to increase sensitivity the exam should be performed in various positions of the joint.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,407

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArthritis & RheumatologyMême sujetNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchTravaux en français237 207