Peace‐building through an international child health elective
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Context and setting The International Child Health Elective is a multidisciplinary programme involving the collaboration of students and faculty from Canada and the Middle East. Each year, the programme subtheme focuses on a particular health issue according to the following principles: Reflects a global child health issue Allows for a focused depth of study Provides a multidisciplinary approach, exploring determinants of health, medical and psychosocial issues, and roles of all health-care providers Enhances health sciences curricula at participating universities Addresses community needs through active participation During the month-long elective, students from Canadian, Israeli, Jordanian and Palestinian medical schools come together through an international non-government organisation in Canada. Student selection is based on their academic interests in the subtheme and their willingness to work collaboratively with students from other cultures and academic disciplines. Why the idea was necessary The elective programme is unique among educational opportunities offered to health-care students. As a project developed by students for students, it is distinctively positioned to respond to student academic interests. The community service component of the curriculum allows participants to ground their academic learning with hands-on experience in an applied setting. The multidisciplinary academic and social programming provides rare opportunities for Middle Eastern and Canadian students to work together on common health goals, while nurturing a spirit of peace, co-operation and mutual understanding. This approach allows participants to develop practical interdisciplinary collaborative skills essential to understanding and addressing complex global health problems. What was done The 2003 and 2004 programmes focused on paediatric oncology and congenital hearing loss, respectively. The 4-week curriculum consisted of presentations from academic and community leaders, problem-based learning cases, discussion groups and experiential learning in the community. Participants took initiative in researching important health literature collaboratively and presenting these findings to the programme stakeholders. The programme also included team-building activities to encourage the development of personal and professional relationships among the students. Each programme was evaluated using qualitative research methods, which have contributed towards improving future curricula. Evaluation of the results and impact An important academic outcome related by participants was an improved understanding of diverse child health issues. Moreover, the students evaluated the multidisciplinary focus, the community service component and the opportunity for cross-cultural co-operation as highlights of the programme. The experience fostered strong relationships between participants from communities affected by conflict; these connections have persisted and encouraged the development of new health for peace initiatives. The unique experience of transcending political boundaries to explore an important health issue is best explained by a participant of the 2004 programme on congenital hearing loss: ‘What we learned most of all was about our own “deafness” and how we can better listen to each other and co-operate to address common medical problems in the Middle East’.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,025 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».