MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2013476743 · doi:10.1353/toc.0.0039

On Social Cohesion in Greece

2010· article· en· W2013476743 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andromachi Hadjiyanni

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Tocqueville Review/La revue Tocqueville · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSocial Capital and Networks
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVaguenessCohesion (chemistry)PoliticsEpistemologySociologyGroup cohesivenessSocial psychologyPositive economicsPolitical sciencePsychologyLawLinguisticsPhilosophyEconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

On Social Cohesion in Greece Andromachi Hadjiyanni (bio) In this article we will focus on social cohesion in modern Greek society by presenting aspects of social life where there is either evidence of social cohesion or evidence to the contrary. The study of social cohesion is not an easy task owing to the fact that the concept has become a battleground of opposing forces engendering heated debates between writers who have attempted, over the last two decades, to give an explicit and comprehensive definition of the concept.1 Some argue that this concept has not been conceptually processed in an adequate way. Consequently, it is characterized by uncertainty and has become construed in numerous ways to suit a variety of situations/agendas. As a result, this term has been adapted to the requirements and the limitations of public action and, for this reason, has been widely disseminated.2 Some others claim that 'the concept of social cohesion is not a well-defined concept and, as such, does not (and cannot) lead to a clear sociopolitical project. The vagueness of the concept is not due to poor or contradictory academic work, but to the fact that its content is the subject of multiple 'rapport de forces' between social groups and political organizations that are trying to impose their own project of social cohesion'.3 In a recent paper, Forsé and Parodi (2009) propose 'A theory for social cohesion' adapting the view that social cohesion is a multidimensional concept whose definition is not obvious because it [End Page 7] describes, simultaneously, a situation and a procedure, while, at the same time, provides arguments about the real (real society) and the ideal (a society with ideal configuration) according to the citizens' view.4 However, the basic idea, according to analysts around which this theory is organised, is that in our societies, social justice - a concept already present in the work of Durkheim - is at the heart of social cohesion.5 According to Forsé and Parodi, we can estimate the social cohesion of a society based on empirical evidence but this estimate must be based on opinions as well as practices, in facts as well as in rights. Thus, to what extent can we talk about social cohesion in Modern Greek society and in which areas can we detect it? To answer this question, we have studied three main areas where we believe that social solidarity and, consequently, social cohesion can be identified: –. The area of work (which encompasses the issues of employment, unemployment, poverty and social inequalities), –. The area of social bonds (which encompasses the issues of social capital and of civil society, the issues of family and the welfare state, the issue of trust in other persons and trust in institutions), and –. The area of national identity (which encompasses the issues of religion and religious minorities as well as the issue of immigration). Before we refer to the aspects of social cohesion in Greece in the recent years, we should highlight some milestones of the political, social and economic life in Greece in the post war era which will facilitate an understanding of our investigation. Greece, at the end of World War II, had a civil war which left the country deeply split, politically polarized and in a cycle of continuous political crises.6 During the period following the war, there was a large internal migration flow of the mainly agricultural population to urban areas and, at the same time, emigration to the United States, Canada and Western Germany. Within two decades, the country changed dramatically from an agricultural to an urban society: the way of life as well as consumption habits changed. Consequently, a high level of economic development took place. This period after the war was characterised by limited or one could say troubling democracy - a contradictory 'democratic' period consisting of elements of authoritarianism and democracy.7 It concluded with the instalment of the dictatorship from 1967 until 1974. This was an especially difficult [End Page 8] and painful period on a political and social level because all rights were suppressed within Greece whereas the country was isolated internationally. After the fall of the dictatorship, democracy reappeared in Greece which...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,849
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,330
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Tocqueville Review/La revue TocquevilleMême sujetSocial Capital and NetworksTravaux en français237 207