MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2013911611 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e31819056e9

Successful Repair of Symptomatic Extremity Muscle Herniation with Synthetic Mesh

2008· article· en· W2013911611 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Miroslav S. Gilardino, Jon B. Loftus, Jean‐Paul Brutus

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMuscle and Compartmental Disorders
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de MontréalHôpital Notre-Dame
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineSurgeryFascia lataFasciotomyFascia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir: Muscle herniation in the extremities is the result of an acquired fascial defect, causing pain or discomfort on physical exertion of the affected limb in symptomatic cases. The treatment options for symptomatic extremity muscle herniation in the lower limb are well documented in the literature and include conservative management (activity limitation, compressive stockings, and so on), wide fasciotomy, direct approximation of the fascial defect, tibial periosteal flap, partial muscular excision, and patch repair with autologous fascia lata or synthetic mesh.1 To date, however, the use of synthetic mesh to correct symptomatic extremity muscle herniation has been reported only in a single case by Siliprandi et al., who utilized Mersilene mesh (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, N.J.) to achieve symptomatic relief and cosmetic correction of anterior tibialis muscle herniation in a lower extremity.2 Based on the success of this isolated case report, the authors' goal was to expand the clinical experience in the literature with synthetic mesh repair of lower extremity muscle herniation, in addition to reporting its novel use in a case of upper extremity muscle herniation. Three patients with symptomatic extremity muscle herniation secondary to trauma were treated. Two defects were located in lower extremity and the remaining defect was in the upper extremity (Table 1). Repair was achieved using a single layer of Prolene mesh (Ethicon) as an inlay, secured in place under minimal tension with 2.0 Prolene (Ethicon) in an interrupted fashion. Skin closure was performed in two layers. Postoperatively, the patient was immobilized for 1 week, at which time passive range of motion exercises were initiated (Figs. 1 and 2).Table 1: Summary of CasesFig. 1.: Preoperative view of symptomatic forearm herniation. The visible mass is tender, located over the proximal third of the flexor surface on his right forearm, and accentuated by elbow flexion and forearm pronation.Fig. 2.: Follow-up (postoperative) view at 6 months after mesh repair. The patient had complete resolution of his preoperative pain and bulging, and is shown with the forearm in a flexed and pronated position.Presented in this report are the repairs of three cases of symptomatic extremity muscle herniation using synthetic patches of Prolene mesh. This permanent mesh is nonreactive and durable. Much like the repair performed using harvested fascia lata, the synthetic mesh repair is robust and under no tension, which theoretically decreases the rate of hernia recurrence.3 Potential disadvantages are an increased risk of infection with a synthetic, nonabsorbable foreign body and the risk of adhesions between the mesh and the underlying structures. To minimize the latter, we utilized a short period of immobilization coupled with early range-of-motion exercises. All patients had complete resolution of their preoperative symptoms (at rest and during activity), in addition to no visible bulging at follow-up, which ranged from 12 to 26 months. In addition, with this technique there is no donor-site morbidity and shorter operative times due to the obviated need for graft harvest. We believe that this technique is a favorable option for the treatment of symptomatic extremity muscle herniation, particularly for larger fascial defects, where the donor-site morbidity of sizeable fascial harvests can be substantial.4 In addition, we have shown that this technique can be effectively utilized for symptomatic extremity muscle herniation in the forearm, a novel application. DISCLOSURE None of the authors has any commercial associations or financial interests in any of the products used in or results derived from this research project. Miroslav S. Gilardino, M.D., M.Sc. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery McGill University Health Center Montreal, Quebec, Canada Jon B. Loftus, M.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery Upstate Medical University Syracuse, N.Y. Jean-Paul Brutus, M.D. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery University of Montreal Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,669

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2008
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgeryMême sujetMuscle and Compartmental DisordersTravaux en français237 207