MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2014157353 · doi:10.4171/owr/2007/17

Arbeitsgemeinschaft: Conformal Field Theory

2008· article· en· W2014157353 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yasuyuki Kawahigashi, Victor Ostrik, Christoph Schweigert

Notice bibliographique

RevueOberwolfach Reports · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMathematics
ThématiqueAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConformal mapField (mathematics)Conformal field theoryTheoretical physicsQuantum electrodynamicsMathematicsPhysicsPure mathematicsGeometry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Arbeitsgemeinschaft mit aktuellem Thema “Algebraic structures in conformal field theories”, organized by Y. Kawahigashi (University of Tokyo), V. Ostrik (University of Oregon) and C. Schweigert (University of Hamburg), was held from April 1 to 7, 2007. Two-dimensional conformal field theory plays a fundamental role in the theory of two-dimensional critical systems of classical statistical mechanics, in quasi one-dimensional condensed matter physics and in string theory. The study of defects in systems of condensed matter physics, of percolation probabilities and of (open) string perturbation theory in the background of certain solitonic solutions of string theory, the so-called D-branes, forces one to analyze conformal field theories on surfaces that may have boundaries and/or can be non-orientable. This study has recently led to deeper insight into the mathematical structure of conformal field theory. Many mathematical disciplines have contributed to a better understanding of conformal field theory and have received stimulating input from questions arising in conformal field theories. There are two major approaches to chiral conformal field theory: one that is based on operator algebras and one based on vertex algebras. In both approaches, chiral conformal field theory is described by a certain infinite dimensional algebraic structure. In the first approach, conformal field theory is described by a net of von Neumann algebras, where each von Neumann algebra consists of bounded linear operators and is generated by local observables. This approach was initiated by Haag and Kastler more than 40 years ago (and applies also to quantum field theories in dimensions other than two). The latter is based on algebraic axiomatization of quantum fields in chiral conformal field theory and was initiated by Frenkel, Lepowsky, Meurman and Borcherds in the 1980s. Both algebraic structures lead to representation categories which are tensor categories and, in the case of rational chiral conformal field theories, more specifically modular tensor categories. In the operator algebraic approach, the representation category consists of representations of a net of von Neumann algebras on a Hilbert space; while its original form is due to Doplicher, Haag and Roberts, for chiral conformal field theory certain adaptations have to be made. The representation category of vertex algebras consists of modules over (conformal) vertex algebras. In this Arbeitsgemeinschaft, we have studied algebraic structures related to tensor categories arising in conformal field theory. These tensor categories also encode the monodromy representations of the vector bundles of conformal blocks for rational vertex algebras, objects that are of interest for algebraic geometry. Moreover, modular tensor categories are a crucial ingredient in the construction of three-dimensional topological field theories. While chiral conformal field theories have certain physical applications in the description of quantum Hall systems, full local conformal field theories are relevant for the physical applications referred to in the first paragraph. Recently, it has been understood that the construction of a full local conformal field theory is best described using the structure of a module category over the tensor category that describes the chiral data. In view of the above background, we started the Arbeitsgemeinschaft with a general introduction (Svegstrup) to tensor categories and module categories to provide an oecumenic language for both approaches. Then we had three talks on how tensor categories naturally arise in various approaches to conformal field theory: through operator algebras (Bartels), loop groups (Bunke), and Frobenius algebras (Grossman). The notion of a fusion category provides an abstract framework for various kinds of representation categories. The quantum double construction, originally due to Drinfeld, is a very important method to produce a modular tensor category. It applies to a finite group and also to a more general tensor category. Whenever a finite group acts on a conformal field theory by symmetries, one can pass to a new theory fixed by such a symmetry. This new theory is called an orbifold, and constructions of this type are studied in many different approaches. Doubles of finite groups, their representation categories and orbifold theories in the operator algebraic approach were introduced in the talks by Müller and Gray. Certain module categories can be classified and the A - D - E classification for the case of the quantum SL(2) due to Kirillov and Ostrik is a basic example. Another type of classification for fusion categories is the one for given fusion rules or a given number of simple objects. Various such classification results have been obtained by Ostrik and collaborators; they have been the subject of two talks (Phung, Cuntz). The operator algebraic approach based on theory of subfactors by Jones has produced a few exceptional tensor categories (the topic of Peters' talk) which have not been obtained by other approaches such as theory of quantum groups. Our understanding of such structures in the framework of conformal field theory is still very poor and further developments are expected. There have been various concrete constructions of (2+1) -dimensional topological quantum field theory in the sense of Atiyah. Two of such constructions, due to Reshetikhin–Turaev and Turaev–Viro, are particularly closely related to tensor categories. In these constructions, a three-dimensional closed manifold is realized through Dehn surgery and triangulation, respectively, and combinatorial data arising from a tensor category produce a number for each closed manifold which is a topological invariant of the manifold. This was explained in a first talk by Suszek; in a second talk (Schommer-Pries), the construction of three-dimensional topological field theories from subfactors was presented. Conformal blocks play a fundamental role in conformal field theory. They were defined in the concrete context of Wess–Zumino–Witten models in Graziano's talk and the Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov connection on them was introduced in Nieper–Wißkirchen's talk. Correlation functions, symmetries and dualities are studied in the categorical framework of conformal field theory. Techniques from topological field theory provide tools to study such objects. This was the topic of two talks (Lehn, Zito). In this context, a tensor functor from a tensor category to a category of bimodules called \alpha -induction plays a prominent role; this was the topic of a Asaeda's talk. A study of boundary conformal field theory in the operator algebraic approach, based on recent results of Longo–Rehren was presented by Bahns. It gives a concrete realization of the general abstract structure. We had 17 talks by the participants and two sessions where 12 participants gave 10-minute presentations on their work. We also had two short supplemental presentations by the organizers. We had a sufficient amount of time for free discussions among the participants. The meeting had 54 participants from various countries in Europe and the U.S., Canada, Japan and India.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,117
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,063
Tête enseignante GPT0,347
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOberwolfach ReportsMême sujetAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchTravaux en français237 207