MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2014416107 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000000232

Highlights From the 2014 Joint Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS)—European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS)

2015· article· en· W2014416107 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Fiona Costello, Marechiel Santos-Lang

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRetinal and Optic Conditions
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMultiple sclerosisAttendanceMedicineLibrary scienceFamily medicinePsychiatryPolitical scienceComputer scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The 2014 Joint ACTRIMS-ECTRIMS meeting was held in Boston, Massachusetts, at the John B. Hynes Veterans Memorial Convention Center, September 10–13, 2014. With an impressive 8806 registered participants representing 92 countries in attendance, this was the largest joint meeting of multiple sclerosis (MS) specialists ever held in North America. Notably, NANOS was well represented at the event, with several of our own members included among the 147 faculty representatives. Dr Steve Galetta (New York, USA) delivered a sizzling talk, “Red flags in MS: Zebras or horses?” in the highly popular Differential Diagnoses and Diagnostic Dilemmas teaching course chaired by Dr Patrick Vermersch (Lille, France). Together with Dr Emmanuelle Waubant (San Francisco, USA), Drs Galetta and Vermersch used a case-based format to apply the recently revised McDonald criteria and demonstrate how magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures can support, implement, or even replace some clinical parameters in the diagnosis of MS. The course also highlighted the utility of new MRI protocols, including double-inversion recovery sequences, which can be used to detect small cortical lesions in MS patients. High-field MRI studies were also used to illustrate how penetrating veins can be detected in most MS lesions using T2 or susceptibility-weighted MRI. The Neuro-Ophthalmology Update was chaired by Dr Fiona Costello (Calgary, Canada) and featured Dr Je[Combining Acute Accent]rôme de Seze (Strasbourg, France), and Dr Laura Balcer (New York, USA) as speakers. Dr Costello kicked off the session with a talk entitled, “Visual Manifestations of CNS Demyelinating Disorders.” This primer outlined the approach to clinical localization of common visual manifestations in MS and related syndromes. Dr Costello also introduced the concept of the afferent visual pathway as a clinical model of MS, which was expanded upon in the talks that followed. Dr. de Seze reviewed new diagnostic criteria that enlarge the spectrum of the neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, and proposed therapeutic strategies to help interpret AQP-4 antibody results in a presentation called, “Neuromyelitis Optica: New Diagnostic Criteria Enlarge the Spectrum.” Dr Laura Balcer closed the session with a panoramic summary entitled “The Role of Visual Outcomes in MS Clinical Trials”, with specific emphasis on the role of low-contrast letter acuity, visual evoked potential testing, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Course participants identified several key learning points, which they planned to implement in their day-to-day clinical practice based on the course content, including the role of OCT testing and the value of more detailed visual assessments for their patients. The 2014 Joint ACTRIMS-ECTRIMS meeting showcased cutting edge-research in the field of MS. A record-breaking 1724 abstracts were submitted for consideration: 94 were selected for platform presentations, and an additional 981 were selected as posters. There were numerous abstract topics presented that would be of potential interest to neuro-ophthalmologists including diagnosis and differential diagnosis, clinical trials, disease biomarkers, OCT, experimental models, neuromyelitis optica, neurophysiology, neuroprotection, and repair. A novel feature of the 2014 Joint ACTRIMS-ECTRIMS meeting was the effort made to critically examine how factors including the “expert patient”, news media, social media, and health policy affect the relationships between MS patients' health care providers, and researchers. Certainly, the importance of issues such as patient advocacy and social media-engagement would also resonate with neuro-ophthalmologists. The potential value of the 2014 Joint ACTRIMS-ECTRIMS meeting was aptly summarized by Dr Steve Galetta: “This provides a large-scale opportunity to view the advances for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis. Vision has become one of the key outcome measures for many of the latest clinical trials and the data is usually presented first in this forum”. The annual ACTRIMS and ECTRIMS meetings, whether held jointly or as separate events, introduce new agents emerging from the therapeutic pipeline and highlight early clinical trial findings related to MS and vision. The next joint meeting has yet to be announced, but future ACTRIMS and ECTRIMS (2015, Barcelona, Spain) meetings could be of considerable interest to neuro-ophthalmologists who wish to keep abreast of novel clinical and research developments in MS.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,169
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,742

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,450
Tête enseignante GPT0,405
Écart entre enseignants0,045 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologyMême sujetRetinal and Optic ConditionsTravaux en français237 207