MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2014817936 · doi:10.1176/pn.44.14.0001a

Study Finds Link Between Sudden Death, Stimulant Meds

2009· article· en· W2014817936 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jun Yan

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStimulantMethylphenidateSudden deathMedicinePopulationPsychiatryAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderPsychologyInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Next article Clinical & Research NewsFull AccessStudy Finds Link Between Sudden Death, Stimulant MedsJun YanJun YanPublished Online:17 Jul 2009https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.44.14.0001aA case-control study in children and adolescents adds to evidence supporting a link between the use of stimulants, commonly used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and an increase in the risk of sudden death in this population.The researchers in a study led by Madelyn Gould, Ph.D., M.P.H., and published online June 15 in AJP in Advance examined mortality data and death certificates from states' vital-statistics reports from 1985 through 1996 and identified 564 cases of sudden unexplained death (including from sudden cardiac dysrhythmia and unknown causes) in children and adolescents aged 7 to 19. A control group of 564 youths who died as passengers in motor vehicle accidents were matched to the case series for age, sex, year of death, and data source.Gould is a professor of clinical epidemiology in psychiatry at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and a research scientist at the New York State Psychiatric Institute.The analysis found a significant association between sudden unexplained death and the use of a stimulant at the time of death.Ten (1.8 percent) of the youth in the sudden-death group were taking the stimulant methylphenidate. In comparison, two (0.4 percent) in the control group were taking stimulants, one of whom was taking methylphenidate. The risk increase was statistically significant, with an odds ratio of 7.4 (95 percent confidence interval: 1.4 to 74.9). This association remained statistically significant in a sensitivity analysis excluding cases in which the youth were using concomitant tricyclic antidepressants.Because of numerous case reports of sudden death that have been linked to stimulant use and the known cardiovascular effects of these drugs, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been monitoring and analyzing stimulant-related, adverse-reaction reports for several years.The Canadian regulatory agency, Health Canada, suspended the marketing of mixed amphetamine salts briefly in 2005 out of concern about a possible association between the drug and sudden cardiac death, but later allowed its return after a stronger warning was added to the product labeling.Both countries' regulatory agencies currently recommend that stimulants not be used in children or adults with structural cardiac abnormalities, cardiomyopathy, or other cardiac abnormalities.On the same day the study was published, the FDA issued a public announcement urging parents not to stop a child's stimulant medication on the basis of this study alone. "Given the limitations of this study's methodology, the FDA is unable to conclude that these data affect the overall risk and benefit profile of stimulant medications used to treat ADHD in children," according to the announcement, which also noted that the FDA and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality are sponsoring a large epidemiological study on this issue, and additional data are forthcoming."[The Gould study] is the first methodologically rigorous study to identify a link between therapeutic use of stimulant medication and sudden unexplained deaths in children without demonstrated heart abnormalities," wrote Benedetto Vitiello, M.D., and Kenneth Towbin, M.D., in an editorial accompanying the study. Nevertheless, they cautioned that as sudden unexplained death is very rare in children and adolescents, this study had to rely on small numbers, and "it is not possible to quantify the risk beyond estimating that it is very small."Vitiello is chief of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Child and Adolescent Treatment and Preventive Intervention Research Branch. Towbin is chief of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in the Mood and Anxiety Disorder Program at NIMH.Although retrospective studies are at risk of being contaminated by confounding factors and inherent biases, it would be nearly impossible to conduct prospective, randomized clinical trials to prove the link between stimulant use and sudden death, since the rate is so small, the editorial noted; however, a biological basis exists for the cardiovascular risks of these drugs. Considering the widespread use of stimulants for ADHD and the substantial rates of diversion and misuse, especially among high school and college students, clinicians should be careful when prescribing them." Stimulants are not innocuous and ... their therapeutic use requires careful diagnostic assessment, diligent safety screening, and ongoing monitoring," Vitiello and Towbin wrote.The study was funded by the FDA and NIMH."Sudden Death and Use of Stimulant Medications in Youths" is posted at<ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/reprint/appi.ajp.2009.09040472v1>. The editorial "Stimulant Treatment of ADHD and Risk of Sudden Death in Children" is posted at<ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/reprint/appi.ajp.2009.09050619v1>. The FDA announcement is posted at<www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm166667.htm>.▪ ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,069
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,939

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,061
Tête enseignante GPT0,366
Écart entre enseignants0,305 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderTravaux en français237 207