Notice bibliographique
Résumé
found Sam.1 This opening to a May 1977 telex helped further an intense and genuine foreign policy engagement in southern Africa by Canada and other western powers on the United Nations security council. Canada and West Germany were months into two-year temporary terms and were, along with the United States, the United Kingdom, and France, participating in a diplomatic contact (also called the five). Canada had been included by the others because of its council seat.2 The group, an initiative of President Jimmy Carter, had come together in March to find an internationally acceptable solution to the problem of Namibia, which South Africa was administering in defiance of world opinion - as defined by a 1966 United Nations general assembly resolution revoking South Africa's League of Nations mandate over the territory, and a 1971 International Court of Justice advisory opinion that found its presence to be illegal. The solution, embodied in council resolution 385, 31 January 1976, called Namibia's transition to independence and majority-rule after United Nations-supervised and -controlled elections.3 The group was not formally a part of the security council or the United Nations, but its members planned to ask the organization to deploy peacekeepers to handle implementation.To get to that point, the group needed to find Sam. The president of the South West Africa People's Organization (SWAPO), Sam Nujoma had avoided meeting the group and could not be found in April or May when they sought to give him an initial working paper. Nujoma's support was crucial because SWAPO was Namibia's leading liberation movement. The general assembly had recognized SWAPO as the sole and authentic representative of the Namibian people.4 And suddenly, there he was, in the VIP lounge of Maputo airport, Mozambique. Nujoma was in Maputo the United Nations international conference in support of the peoples of Zimbabwe and Namibia, 16-21 May, and Verona Edelstein of Canada's permanent mission to the United Nations had found him. She received instructions from all governments to convince Nujoma to meet the group in Maputo. With the help of Salim Salim, Tanzania's ambassador to the United Nations, who took a great personal risk as a representative of a socialist state in encouraging the western initiative, she managed to do so. Nujoma told the conference delegates that he had no confidence in the gang of five (as the non-aligned movement tended to call it), but would participate for whatever it was worth.5That the group did not free Namibia during 1977-79, ^s three most active years, is not this article's main concern. (It argues that failure was the result of South Africa's wanting to delay as long as possible the moment when it had to surrender Namibia.) The article is largely about an examination of Canadian foreign policy towards Africa and southern Africa in the mid- to the late-i970s. Canada's Africa policy in that period has been dismissed as having been subject to its liberal-capitalist system and the western alliance, as improvisational and undisciplined by a clear sense of the national interest in Africa, and as hardly changing from 196 1 to the mid1980s. For most Canadians, the continent stirred only on the level of the imagination.6 In fact, Canada had significant political and security interests in Africa that the government was actively reviewing and pursuing in light of the change sweeping the continent. Just as important, the group forced the Department of External Affairs to learn an enormous amount and fully elaborate Canada's foreign policy towards Africa. This all meant that External Affairs was ready when Brian Mulroney began calling the imposition of sanctions against South Africa in the mid-1980s.Before the group's initiative, Africa and southern Africa received less attention from the Pierre Elliott Trudeau government than other files of comparable scope and complexity. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,715 | 0,442 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».