MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2014946476 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01182.x

Commentary on Smith L and Callery P (2005) Children's accounts of their preoperative information needs. <i>Journal of Clinical Nursing</i> 14, 230–238

2006· letter· en· W2014946476 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Barbara Sheer

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Clinical Nursing · 2006
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePediatric Pain Management Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInformation needsPerspective (graphical)AnxietyMedicineSample (material)PsychologyMedical educationNursingPsychiatryComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In this study conducted at the Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital, the authors assessed the information needs of children through direct interviews with children aged 7–11 years. Although limited by sample size, self-selection, timing and assumed homogeneous background, it is an important view from the perspective of the children. It is universally accepted that children should participate in their care and be informed of procedures in an age-appropriate manner. However, in a review of the literature, there is limited information regarding the specific information children need to allay their anxiety. In this study, children were able to identify their learning needs for preoperative information. The study is an important step in understanding approaches to make the surgical experience more comfortable for children. The children in the survey reported that they did not receive direct information from the hospital or from a healthcare professional. The information from this sample came from printed information for parents, television and experiences of others. This is an important issue as information from other sources may be misinterpreted, or misunderstood. Experiences of parents and others have an emotional impact and may have little relationship to the child's experience. The methodology enabled the children to identify their needs through writing, drawing and discussing their information needs. This enabled the children to communicate in an age-appropriate format. Categories of information desired by the children included information about the procedure, anaesthesia, the hospital environment and pain management. In an online search* * The search of the websites and online information in the UK, US and Canada is Barbara Sheers’ contribution and was not included in the original article by Lucy Smith and her colleagues. most children's hospitals in the US, Canada and the UK offer a wide spectrum of services for children and their families to receive preoperative information. Services range from limited information about the facility, focusing on essential information relating to hospital policy, to age-appropriate information about the expectations of hospitalizations. Most of the information was directed at the parents. Only a few of the hospital websites had information directed towards the children or implied that such information was available. Many of children's hospitals engage the services of child life specialists to ease the hospital experience and answer questions about the hospital experience. Some facilities offer preoperative tours designed for the children. During the tours children spend time in the environment and play with equipment. During the prehospitalization visit there is an opportunity to have their questions answered. Although these services are available, families may elect not to use them for a variety of reasons. In a few of the hospitals preoperative information sessions and tours are mandatory. This study adds to our body of knowledge of the needs of children and how their needs can be expressed. Clinicians can use this knowledge to prepare children better for their surgical procedures and alleviate anxiety thereby improving outcomes in care. Considerations for preoperative teaching include issues of age-appropriate information, the timing and delivery of the information and the opportunity to meet the specific information needs of the individual child. The information needs can be met in a variety of formats including booklets, printed materials, games and visits. The delivery and timing of the information needs to be geared to the child's age, experience and developmental level. Too much information or graphic descriptions can create additional anxiety. The timing needs to be close enough to procedure to allow for information synthesis with a contact to ask additional questions as they arise. Additional research is needed to explore the best methods to deliver the preoperative teaching and measure the effectiveness of the teaching in postoperative outcomes. The findings suggest that administrators and clinicians need to work together to afford flexibility in hospital policy to offer informational services that are age appropriate to the children. Some facilities have model programmes in place. These programmes view the child as the patient and focus on meeting their learning needs. Portions of the model programmes can be expanded into all settings offering surgical procedures to children. This study is an initial step, as clinicians begin to understand what children want and need to know about their procedures. In meeting the learning needs of the children we can reduce anxiety and teach them to be better consumers of health care.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,065
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,129

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,051
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,006
Communication savante0,0040,007
Science ouverte0,0080,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0340,042
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,367
Écart entre enseignants0,342 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Clinical NursingMême sujetPediatric Pain Management TechniquesTravaux en français237 207