MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2015073683 · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-00014

Observational Studies of Treatment Effectiveness: Some Cautions

2004· letter· en· W2015073683 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Andreas Laupacis, Muhammad Mamdani

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of Internal Medicine · 2004
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Établissements canadiensInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineStatinObservational studyMyocardial infarctionRandomized controlled trialAtorvastatinEzetimibeAcute coronary syndromeSimvastatinInternal medicineRosuvastatinClinical trialPlaceboPolypillDiseaseCardiologyAlternative medicinePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Editorials1 June 2004Observational Studies of Treatment Effectiveness: Some CautionsAndreas Laupacis, MD, MSc and Muhammad Mamdani, PharmD, MA, MPHAndreas Laupacis, MD, MScFrom Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada. and Muhammad Mamdani, PharmD, MA, MPHFrom Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-00014 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail The last decade has seen an extraordinary proliferation of evidence that statins decrease mortality in patients who have, or are at risk for developing, cardiovascular disease (1, 2). The benefits extend to high-risk patients with normal cholesterol levels (2) and have led some to suggest that all individuals older than 55 years of age should receive statins as part of a "polypill" (3). In this issue, Spencer and colleagues (4) add to the evidence in favor of statins. They conclude that statin users with an acute coronary syndrome are less likely to present with ST-segment elevation or myocardial infarction than ...References1. LaRosa JC, He J, Vupputuri S. Effect of statins on risk of coronary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. JAMA. 1999;282:2340-6. [PMID: 10612322] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:7-22. [PMID: 12114036] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Wald NJ, Law MR. A strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease by more than 80%. BMJ. 2003;326:1419. [PMID: 12829553] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Spencer FA, Allegrone J, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Fox KA, Granger CB, et al . Association of statin therapy with outcomes of acute coronary syndromes: The GRACE Study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:857-66. LinkGoogle Scholar5. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, et al . Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized, controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321-33. [PMID: 12117397] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Grady D, Herrington D, Bittner V, Blumenthal R, Davidson M, Hlatky M, et al . Cardiovascular disease outcomes during 6.8 years of hormone therapy: Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study follow-up (HERS II). JAMA. 2002;288:49-57. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ezekowitz MD, Ganz P, Oliver MF, Waters D, et al . Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study: a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;285:1711-8. [PMID: 11277825] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Glesby MJ, Hoover DR. Survivor treatment selection bias in observational studies: examples from the AIDS literature. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:999-1005. [PMID: 8624068] LinkGoogle Scholar9. Redelmeier DA, Tan SH, Booth GL. The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1516-20. [PMID: 9593791] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41-55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar11. Juurlink DN, Mamdani M, Kopp A, Laupacis A, Redelmeier DA. Drug-drug interactions among elderly patients hospitalized for drug toxicity. JAMA. 2003;289:1652-8. [PMID: 12672733] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. Mamdani M, Juurlink DN, Kopp A, Naglie G, Austin PC, Laupacis A. Gastrointestinal bleeding following the introduction of COX 2 inhibitors: an ecological study. BMJ. 2004; [In press]. Google Scholar13. Walter DH. Insights into early and rapid effects of statin therapy after coronary interventions. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10:369-73. [PMID: 14965198] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14. Newby LK, Kristinsson A, Bhapkar MV, Aylward PE, Dimas AP, Klein WW, et al . Early statin initiation and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2002;287:3087-95. [PMID: 12069671] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Andreas Laupacis, MD, MSc; Muhammad Mamdani, PharmD, MA, MPHAffiliations: From Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.Disclosures: None disclosed.Corresponding Author: Andreas Laupacis, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Avenue–G106, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada; e-mail, [email protected]on.ca.Current Author Addresses: Drs. Laupacis and Mamdani: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Avenue–G106, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoAssociation of Statin Therapy with Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndromes: The GRACE Study Frederick A. Spencer , Jeanna Allegrone , Robert J. Goldberg , Joel M. Gore , Keith A.A. Fox , Christopher B. Granger , Rajendra H. Mehta , and David Brieger , and the GRACE Investigators* Metrics Cited byEfficacy gap between phase II and subsequent phase III studies in oncologyNeuraminidase inhibitors for influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis of regulatory and mortality dataACE insertion/deletion polymorphism (rs1799752) modifies the renoprotective effect of renin-angiotensin system blockade in patients with IgA nephropathyStatins for acute coronary syndromeEffect of β-Blockers on Cardiac and Pulmonary Events and Death in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseExtended-release niacin/laropiprant for lipid management: observational study in clinical practiceDeterminants of lipid goal achievement in patients on extended-release nicotinic acid/laropiprant in primary care clinical practiceSafety of nicotine replacement therapy in critically ill smokers: a retrospective cohort studyAntivirals for Treatment of InfluenzaMark A. Jones, PhD, Rokuro Hama, MD, and Chris Del Mar, MDIntensieve glucoseregulering en het risico op kanker bij type 2 diabetes: een meta-analyse van belangrijke trialsStatins for acute coronary syndromeIntensive glycaemic control and cancer risk in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of major trialsThe effects of achieving hypothermia early in a heterogeneous population of patients with cardiac arrestPersistence with Statins and Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort StudyGlucose-lowering therapies and cancer risk: the trials and tribulations of trials and observationsDiabetes, Insulin Use, and Cancer Risk: Are Observational Studies Part of the Solution–or Part of the Problem?Metformin treatment in diabetes and heart failure: when academic equipoise meets clinical realityEfficacy of sublingual specific immunotherapy in intermittent and persistent allergic rhinitis in children: an observational case-control study on 171 patients. The EFESO-children Multicenter TrialEvolución hospitalaria asociada al empleo de fibrinolíticos y tienopiridinas en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio y elevación del segmento ST. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary EventsIn-Hospital Outcomes Associated With Fibrinolytic and Thienopyridine Use in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary EventsEffectiveness of bisphosphonate therapy in a community settingAn easy mathematical proof showed that time-dependent bias inevitably leads to biased effect estimationSustained effects in hypercholesterolaemic patients on combined simvastatin/ezetimibe treatment: observational cohort study in clinical practiceObservational study of sublingual specific immunotherapy in persistent and intermittent allergic rhinitis: the EFESO trialCardiovascular events and insulin therapy: A retrospective cohort analysisComparative Efficacy: What We Know, What We Need to Know, and How We Can Get ThereSaul Malozowski, MD, PhD, MBAThe Impact of Valve Surgery on 6-Month Mortality in Left-Sided Infective EndocarditisNew natural history of interferon-β-treated relapsing multiple sclerosisBeyond randomized controlled trials: A critical comparison of trials with nonrandomized studiesNon-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in patients with renal dysfunction: benefit of low-molecular-weight heparin alone or with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors on outcomes. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary EventsTreating Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes With Aggressive Antiplatelet Therapy (from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events)Improved Clinical Outcomes Associated With Metformin in Patients With Diabetes and Heart FailureBehandlung von Entzündungen im Bereich der oberen Atemwege – Vergleich eines homöopathischen Komplexpräparates mit XylometazolinDe betrouwbaarheid van observationeel onderzoek 1 June 2004Volume 140, Issue 11Page: 923-924KeywordsAcute coronary syndromeMortalityMyocardial infarctionObservational studiesOdds ratioRandomized trialsRelative riskStatinsSurvival analysisTreatment guidelines ePublished: 1 June 2004 Issue Published: 1 June 2004 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2004 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,117
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,913

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,183
Tête enseignante GPT0,414
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations46
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of Internal MedicineMême sujetLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthTravaux en français237 207