Another successful University of Saskatchewan Pharmacy Student Business Plan Competition
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The 2012-2013 University of Saskatchewan Pharmasave-Rubicon Annual Innovation in Pharmacy Student Business Plan Competition took place Thursday March 28, in Convocation Hall at the University of Saskatchewan. Congratulations to Jenna Foulds, Ariane Lewis, Amy Lix, Lisa Lukye, and Stephanie Miller of the Pharmaceuticals for Animal Wellness (PAW) team! Each team of student pharmacists was given the task of creating a business plan with the goal of implementing a new, sustainable professional service into an existing practice setting. There were 15 teams of third-year student pharmacists presenting their business plans. Each team had 10 minutes to present their plans to the judges, followed by 5 minutes of questions. Teams competed for prizes, a chance to present to stakeholders who are sponsors and judges of the competition, and also for the opportunity to present to their future colleagues and potential employers at the Annual Pharmacists’ Association of Saskatchewan (PAS) Conference. Plan ideas ranged from implementing services in a pharmacy for specific ethnic populations in Calgary, to adding a public health pharmacist on the Health Bus in Saskatoon, to focusing on implementing compounding and other services for elite level athletes. The mission and sole purpose of the implementation of Pharmaceuticals for Animal Wellness (PAW) is to improve the lives of animals and their owners through the provision of specialized veterinary pharmaceuticals and services. The vision for PAW is to refresh the world of veterinary pharmacy, to empower pet owners and to provide excellence in pharmaceutical care for optimal animal health. The realization of this venture will address the underserved population of Saskatoon and surrounding area. PAW’s fundamental values are passion for its patients, expertise, professionalism and accountability, excellence in products and services, and community integration. Second place went to Jeffrey Herbert, Alanna Hoesgen, Kalen MacLeod, Jill Okrainetz, Patrick Parkinson and Jenna Yurkewich for CHAMP (Comprehensive HIV Assistance in Methadone Patients Program), a program that will provide medication management reviews for patients currently enrolled in the methadone assistance program who are HIV positive. And third place went to Kristen Antunes, Arlene Dies, Harmanpreet Gill, Margaret Maria James, Juanita Lui, and Alyssa MacDougall for their program COPE (Community Outreach Palliative Endeavour) that will offer services and products designed to improve the palliative patient’s quality of life. After 3 very successful years, the competition is set to be held near the end of March 2014 in Saskatoon. For more information, visit the competition website: www.usask.ca/pharmacy-nutrition/the-college/student_business_plan_competition.php. —Jason Perepelkin, University of Saskatchewan
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».