MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2015337079 · doi:10.1353/jaf.2002.0014

Introduction: Folklore in Canada

2002· article· en· W2015337079 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pauline Greenhill, Peter Narváez

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of American Folklore · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCross-Cultural and Social Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFolkloristicsFolkloreHistoryLiteratureNarrativeAnecdoteMetanarrativeFolklifeSociologyArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction:Folklore in Canada Pauline Greenhill (bio) and Peter Narváez (bio) In the introduction and afterword to this special issue of the Journal of American Folklore on Canada, we refer to several kinds of "stories we tell about ourselves" (see Geertz 1973:448). There are stories that Canadian folklorists have told about ourselves-and an indication of what new versions of those stories might look like. There are stories that American folkloristics has told about itself-and suggestions toward what a Canadian folkloristics might wish to say about those stories. And there are stories that American folkloristics has told about Canada-and establishing how those stories have changed. Because we cannot assume that all JAF readers are familiar with all of these stories, we will try to detail their basic structures as well as to critique them (or refer to locations where readers may learn for themselves). This is not, however, the history of Canadian folkloristics (for that see Carpenter 1979; Desdouits and Turgeon 1997; Pocius 2000), but only of the portion that relates directly to JAF. Of course, there is another series of stories here, told in the eight articles that appear in this special issue. Rather than expecting a coherent metanarrative that details how these individuals contribute to the parts of the whole, readers should seek in these works the theoretical and analytical touchstones of Canadian folkloristics that we point to in this introduction and reflect on in the afterword. This special issue is not a thematically linked collection of articles; it is, instead, a series of works that exemplify a national perspective on folklore as a subject of study and as a discipline. We will keep the descriptive metacommentary to a minimum, in order to allow each to tell its own story. But these are not the first Canadian stories told in JAF, so we begin with the following: Stories American Folkloristics Has Told about Canada: The First 100 Years of JAF When Pauline Greenhill's research assistant photocopied every entry relating to Canada in the first 100 years of JAF (see Jackson et al. 1988), the resulting pile of paper was over a foot deep.1 There is a wealth of material in this collection, deserving more than the cursory glance we can provide here. The first 75 years of JAF display a strong, pervasive Canadian influence, yet now the publication of an article by a Canadian [End Page 116] scholar or about a Canadian topic is rare in JAF. Similarly, Canadian involvement in the American Folklore Society is limited. The contents of these early years of Canadian scholarship are a revelation, largely because we (the authors) had hitherto assumed (quite mistakenly, as it turns out) that the current situation has a long history and had persisted throughout the journal's run. This special issue of JAF devoted to Canada has eight predecessors, published between 1916 and 1950 (see Carpenter 1979:197). Indeed, JAF's initial editorial statement mentioned specifically the collection of the "Lore of French Canada, Mexico, etc." (pp. 3-7) as part of the society's mandate. A survey of JAF's first 100 years indicates that, from the very beginning, the journal went well beyond this potentially restricted sphere of interest in publishing Canadian materials. Indeed, the documentation and scholarship on Canadian traditions comprised a significant portion of other aspects of the mandate, including presenting "Lore of the Indian Tribes of North America (Myths, Tales, etc.)" (1888). Not only First Nations and French,2 but also Anglo and various other immigrant traditions were noted, reported on, and, to some extent, theorized by JAF contributors, although these cultural groups were not originally deemed central to the journal's or the society's studies. Canadian content in topics is fairly easy to determine. It is more difficult to identify every contributor of material on Canada, but they appear to fall into four categories. One group includes Franz Boas and his students, reflecting his systematic project to record the traditions of the original peoples of North America. These contributors are mainly Americans and immigrants like Boas and Sapir, but a few are Canadians influenced by and/or working for Boas and his students and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,091
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,527

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0150,004
Communication savante0,0090,003
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0910,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of American FolkloreMême sujetCross-Cultural and Social AnalysisTravaux en français237 207