MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2015393139 · doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000138378.90106.73

A Plea for Language Accuracy in Spinal Treatment

2005· editorial· en· W2015393139 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert B. Winter, John E. Lonstein

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques · 2005
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMedical and Biological Sciences
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePleaMEDLINEIntensive care medicineLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Language accuracy is fundamental to communication in all phases of life, and medicine is one of the areas in which precise accuracy is essential. Spinal surgeons have developed over many years a language of the profession. However, there remain areas of inadequacy and imperfection that need to be solved. This article is an attempt to identify and clarify some of these areas. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE The efforts of various societies, especially the Scoliosis Research Society and the North American Spine Society, through their terminology committees, have greatly improved the confusion that once existed. A good example is the definition of spinal curvature types by the position of the apex of the curve. Another good example was the universal adoption of the Lippman–Cobb method of measurement of curves on a plain x-ray film. MATERIAL AND METHODS The authors, frequent attendees at many spinal conferences in North America as well as worldwide, have developed a list of commonly misused terms. As this list grew and as we continued to hear these misused terms, we decided to go to the dictionary and the already-existing terminologies of various societies to determine what was correct and what was not. The following terms are those we thought the most glaring and most in the need of proper definition. RESULTS ”Thoracic” Versus “Dorsal” Those vertebrae occurring in the chest or thoracic area, defined as those to which ribs are customarily attached, are thoracic vertebrae. The word “dorsal” is the opposite of the word “ventral.” A dorsal spondylodesis (arthrodesis) refers to a posterior fusion operation on the spine and can occur anywhere from the occiput to the sacrum. A thoracic spondylodesis (arthrodesis) refers to a fusion operation involving the thoracic vertebrae, whether done anteriorly (ventrally) or posteriorly (dorsally). TLSO Brace ”TLSO” stands for thoraco-lumbar-sacral orthosis. The word “orthosis” is a synonym for “brace.” It is therefore redundant (and incorrect) to use the phrase “TLSO brace.” Scoliosis Curve As the word “scoliosis” means a lateral curvature of the spine, the phrase “scoliosis curve” is redundant (and incorrect). In Situ For reasons that are difficult to understand, the word “in situ” has frequently been used as synonymous with “noninstrumented.” According to Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary (2nd ed., Simon and Schuster, New York, 1979), the word “in situ” means “in its original place.” If we are dealing with a spondylolisthesis problem in an adolescent and choose to do a noninstrumented arthrodesis, but we achieve a partial reduction of the deformity by casting, this cannot be called an “in situ” fusion. It is a reduction and fusion without instrumentation. Anterior Release Another phrase that has incorrectly crept into our vocabulary is “anterior release,” when what we really mean is “anterior discectomy and fusion.” This is especially wrong as most of the time we approach the scoliosis from its convexity, removing the convex annulus and the disc contents, but not the concave annulus. The additional correction achieved is due to convex shortening, not concave release of tight structures. When dealing with a structural Scheuermann kyphosis, the phrase “anterior release” is more appropriate because we do release tight anterior ligament tissues. However, it is still not accurate as a discectomy and anterior fusion are also done. Can anterior release be done without anterior discectomy and fusion? Yes, of course. The authors had the occasion in 1995 to do a pure anterior release (without either discectomy or fusion) in a 5-year-old boy with a very stiff 100° kyphosis. We wanted to release the very tight anterior longitudinal ligament and anterior annuli without doing anything that would halt or impair anterior growth. He was then slowly stretched with halo traction and held with a halo cast. We suggested that the phrase “anterior discectomy and fusion” be used for our usual anterior operation for scoliosis and “anterior release and fusion” for our usual operation for hyperkyphosis. (The authors thank Dr. David Bradford for bringing to view this particular phraseology problem at the GICD meeting in Ottawa, Canada, in September 1996.) Hardware ”Hardware” refers to those things that one obtains from a hardware store, such as a hammer, saw, screwdriver, chisel, screw, nail, etc., as well as computer hardware. What we place in our patient is a spinal implant. Those tools that we use to insert the implants are called “instruments.” We do not do an operation to “remove the hardware”; we perform an “implant removal.” Epophysiodesis ”Epophysiodesis” refers to the ablation or removal of an epiphyseal plate or, more correctly, a physeal plate. As our profession advances, it may become possible to operate on a young growing child with a worrisome lateral curvature by an endoscopic laser obliteration of the convex one-half of the physeal plates in the curvature area. This could be done without disc removal, attempted arthrodesis, or implants crossing the disc space. The obvious advantage would be to obliterate pathologic convex growth while preserving concave growth and mobility. Therefore, the term “epiphysiodesis” should be reserved for pure physeal plate obliteration. The operation we do now, removal of one-half of the disc and growth plate anteriorly plus convex hemiarthrodesis both anteriorly and posteriorly, should be properly called “anterior and posterior convex hemiepiphysiodesis” (hemiarthrodesis). ”Vertebrectomy” Versus “Corpectomy” The word “vertebrectomy” means removal of the vertebra. This is an operation we do for some tumors and some severe curvatures. Removal of a vertebral body, for example, for decompression of a burst fracture, should be called a “corpectomy” as only the vertebral body is removed, not the other elements of the vertebra. ”Conservative” Treatment Versus “Nonoperative” Treatment Surgical treatment of certain problems is the conservative approach, that is, in a small child with congenital kyphosis, a growing adolescent with a dystrophic neurofibromatosis kyphoscoliosis, or an adolescent idiopathic patient with lordoscoliosis and reduced pulmonary function. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Several words and phrases have been identified that are commonly, but improperly, used. It is hoped that by bringing these terms to the attention of the spinal “community,” a greater precision of language and therefore greater accuracy of communication can occur in our profession.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,642
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,734

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,379
Écart entre enseignants0,358 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Spinal Disorders & TechniquesMême sujetMedical and Biological SciencesTravaux en français237 207