Incidence and Natural History of Ivig-Induced Aseptic Meningitis: A Retrospective Review at a Single Tertiary Care Centre
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Aseptic meningitis is a rare and significant complication of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. The true incidence is unknown as there are a number of case reports and few thorough reviews. Some have suggested the incidence being 0-1% with one reported exception of 11% in the literature. It is important to recognize this condition clinically, as it often mimics infectious meningitis. To determine the true incidence and natural history of IVIg-induced aseptic meningitis, we conducted a retrospective review and case series at a single tertiary care centre by two separate methods. For this study, IVIg-induced aseptic meningitis was defined as: headache with meningismus or a deterioration in mental status after receiving IVIg, with or without accompanying fever, nausea, vomiting, pharyngitis, photophobia, and/or diarrhea (as per the Transfusion Transmitted Injuries Surveillance System of the Public Health Agency of Canada). IVIg headaches alone were not included in our review. Method: We performed a retrospective review of all cases of IVIg-induced aseptic meningitis at London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2013. During the study period, the initial method was to evaluate all reported transfusion reactions (as per the Transfusion Reaction Course [TRAC] system for reporting) to identify possible or probable aseptic meningitis due to IVIg. Subsequently, in our second method, we reviewed and cross-referenced all documented IVIg infusions and all lumbar punctures performed at LHSC during the study period. All patients with both IVIg infusions and lumber punctures were identified and further chart review was performed to determine if these patients had aseptic meningitis due to IVIg. We report on our identified cases of IVIg-induced aseptic meningitis, identify the true incidence, and speculate on the natural history of this condition. Results: During our study period, a total of 1921 IVIg infusions (554,566 g) were administered, with major indications being: chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (25.7%), primary immune deficiency (14.1%), other (primarily rheumatologic indications – 13.9%), multifocal motor neuropathy (10.4%), and adult immune thrombocytopenia (7.4%). 8 cases of aseptic meningitis were reported to the transfusion laboratory by the first method, with no additional cases identified by the second method, which gave us an overall incidence of 0.42%. Indications included: aplastic anemia (1/8), immune thrombocytopenia (3/8), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (1/8), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (1/8), primary immune deficiency (1/8), and myasthenia gravis (1/8). As per our case series, IVIg-induced aseptic meningitis is an uncommon complication of unknown etiology that seems to affect all ages, with no relation to the underlying indication for IVIg. The only predisposing factor seen in our cohort may be a prior exposure to blood products, but other risk factors such as migraines, immune dysregulation, and dose and rate of infusion have been reported in the literature. In this study, patients presented with symptoms within 24-48 hours of IVIg infusion, and were treated with antibiotics initially due to the clinical resemblance and suspicion of bacterial meningitis. However, symptoms self-resolved within 5-7 days. This condition appears to be non-fatal; therefore, treatment is purely supportive, with subsequent IVIg infusions likely requiring premedication or possibly a switch in formulation. Conclusion: In this review of IVIg-induced aseptic meningitis over a 6 year period in a tertiary care centre, we identify a more robust incidence of 0.42% for this condition (consistent with most previous reports). Though this condition can be under-recognized, all possible cases were identified with a rigorous TRAC system for reporting reactions and by using two different methods. Furthermore, we speculate on the natural history of this condition based on our 8 identified cases. Given that this complication can mimic infectious meningitis and cause considerable morbidity, we hope that physicians will be aware of, and recognize, this rare but important complication of IVIg therapy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».