‘Placing’ integration: A critical exploration of immigrants’ occupations in London, Ontario, Canada and Auckland, New Zealand
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We are currently undertaking a comparative international study exploring the integration experiences of a group of multi-national migrants in London, Ontario, Canada and Auckland, New Zealand. International migration is a multi-layered process involving a range of transitions in relation to physical, economic, political, social and cultural aspects of place and occupation (Huot & Laliberte Rudman, 2010; Nayar & Hocking, 2006). Immigrants’ abilities to engage in occupations are central to the process of settling and integrating into a new society (Nayar, Hocking & Wilson, 2007), yet many migration theories fail to explicitly acknowledge the centrality of occupations in the immigration, settlement and integration process. This research will address migrants’ changes in everyday occupations, such as child care or work, and the impacts of these transitions upon their potential for successful integration. Our study will further contribute to the literature by testing the usefulness and applicability of an innovative occupation-based theory of migration, ‘Navigating Cultural Spaces’ developed by Nayar (2009), as well as Huot’s (2011) method of ‘occupational mapping’.\nA critical ethnography consisting of 2 primary stages is being undertaken. Stage 1 entails a review of immigration and policy documents, as well as epidemiological data pertaining to migration in New Zealand and Canada. Its purpose is to identify similarities and differences in patterns of migration as well as in the social structures addressing migrant settlement and integration in the two contexts. Stage 2 involves data collection with 20 immigrants (10 in Auckland and 10 in London). Methods consist of a narrative interview and occupational mapping, whereby participants create a mental map outlining how their daily occupations are embedded in particular places. The narrative interview will elicit a story of the settlement and integration process from each participant. The maps will help to ‘place’ this story by detailing their local spatial use. This serves as a way of identifying routine occupations that participants’ may not think important enough to highlight explicitly within their narratives given their tacit nature. Analysis will be informed by Bourdieu’s theory of practice to enable the interpretation of maps and narratives related to how occupation, and processes integration are inherently place-based. Preliminary findings presented will illustrate how occupational mapping can serve occupational scientists who seek to better understand connections between place and occupation.\nPotential questions for the discussion period: How does place shape the occupational possibilities available to immigrants? How are places shaped by the occupations that are engaged in within them? How does the arrival of immigrants alter the nature of places within which they settle? How does moving from one country (place) to another alter the occupations engaged in by immigrants?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».