American Inspiration: The Story of the Diefenbaker Centre's Unlikely Origins
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A common desire among many politicians is to leave a lasting legacy that ensconces their contributions firmly in the memories of a nation. Perhaps no Canadian leader understood the concept of commemoration better than the nation's thirteenth Prime Minister, John Diefenbaker. He often boasted that he shared a special bond with the Canadian people, and his good standing in the national collective memory was of the utmost importance to him. Diefenbaker desperately wanted to be remembered. When he was ousted from the prime ministership in 1963 after leading the country for nearly six years, Diefenbaker continued to serve as leader of the opposition. Even when he was defeated by Robert Stanfield in 1965 for the Progressive Conservative leadership, Diefenbaker carried on as the Member of Parliament (MP) for the Saskatchewan riding of Prince Albert. He served as a Saskatchewan MP for an incredible 39 years. Diefenbaker did not want to disappear from the hearts and memories of Canadians. Even Diefenbaker, who possessed one of the largest egos in the history of Canadian politics, realized that he could not live forever. Diefenbaker was faced with quite a conundrum. How could he continue to play a role in the Canadian collective memory, even after death? Being remembered and commemorated, however, was not enough for Diefenbaker. He also wanted to make a lasting and meaningful contribution to Canadian society. The former Prime Minister needed a legacy that would allow him to accomplish these two objectives, which for him were integral. In the United States, these legacies exist in the form of presidential libraries. Rutherford B. Hayes, American President from 1877 to 1881, was the first President to be memorialized with a library. Hayes's presidential library opened in 1916, paving the way for the practice to become accepted, and later expected, as tradition. the 1970s presidential libraries were entrenched in American culture. According to Harry S. Truman Library archivist Raymond Geselbracht, By the early 1970s, the presidential library system was clearly successful. Its place in American life was firmly established, and its almost incredibly successful resolution of all the problems concerning the preservation and care of presidential papers--as well as its emergence among tourists as an important attraction--made it appear a permanent institution. (1) Every President from Herbert Hoover, who began his term as American leader in 1929, to Bill Clinton, whose term ended in 2001 and whose institution opened in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 2004, has a presidential library. While a number of institutions were in place in the United States for the national celebration of federal leaders, such a system did not exist in Canada. Since the late 1960s John Diefenbaker had a notion of a fitting tribute that would not only appease his legendary ego, but would also serve as a symbol of unification and Canadiana. He envisioned an institution that would house his papers and make Canadian history accessible to the citizens of Western Canada. Diefenbaker wanted this institution to be located at the University of Saskatchewan, his alma mater. When the former Prime Minister became the chancellor of the University of Saskatchewan in 1969, he declared his intention to give his alma mater his personal papers, memorabilia, and personal library along with his Sir John A. Macdonald collection, which included original manuscripts, books, memorabilia, and historic furniture. In turn, the University pledged that it would house all the items Diefenbaker bequeathed within a single unit. This pledge established the concept for The Right Honourable John G. Diefenbaker Centre (referred to hereafter as the Diefenbaker Centre) as a working archive and public museum. In June 1980, almost a year after Diefenbaker's death, the Diefenbaker Centre opened its doors to the public, making it the only institution of its kind in Canada. With the Centre, Diefenbaker established a unique legacy. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,052 | 0,016 |
| Communication savante | 0,013 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,021 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».