Modelling of Bitumen Ultradispersed Catalytic Upgrading Experiments in a Batch Reactor
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Large reserves of heavy crude oil and bitumen are waiting for novel technical recovery developments. Nevertheless, the very low API gravity and impurities such as sulphur and nitrogen of the reserves, influences the economics of their industrial utilization. In situ catalytic upgrading of heavy oil and bitumen has been proposed and tested in laboratory scale experiments. Experimental evidence from laboratory scale tests are very promising and this novel technique can play an important role in the exploitation of huge resources of heavy oil and bitumen. Accurate analytical and numerical modeling is essential in order to correctly interpret experimental measurements of the in situ upgrading. This work will enhance the understanding and design of field scale processes. In this paper, simulation results of bitumen ultra-dispersed catalytic upgrading experiments in a batch reactor area reported. The results show that ultra-dispersed catalytic upgrading results in relatively high residue conversion and can potentially increase the API gravity of the produced oil. These results hold significant promise for upgrading heavy crude oils and bitumen using an ultra-dispersed catalyst. Introduction The decline of light oil reserves has made the recovery of heavy oil and bitumen an attractive substitute supply for the world's ever increasing energy demand. Large reserves of heavy crude oil and bitumen are waiting for a novel technical recovery development. The very low API gravity and impurities such as sulphur and nitrogen, in these reserves influences the economics of their industrial utilization. The selection of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes to produce such vast resources of heavy crude oil and bitumen depends on technological and economical considerations. Several field scale EOR techniques have been utilized in the past to exploit such huge resources. These EOR techniques include thermal and non-thermal methods. Thermal methods include Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD), Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS), steam injection, In Situ Combustion (ISC), and their variants. Non-thermal methods include miscible flooding, chemical flooding, and their variants. Canada is producing about 14% of the total oil produced by the EOR methods. These are most commonly recovered using thermal operations.(1) The Energy Information Administration (EIA) states that the sulphur content and density of refineries input in the United States has been steadily increasing.(2) To improve the refineries feedstock input quality, the incoming heavy oil needs to be upgraded prior to conventional refining. Heavy oil and bitumen with low API gravity can be made more valuable if they are upgraded to meet the current conventional refining specifications. Surface upgrading of heavy oil and bitumen which is a capital and energy intensive technology has been practiced in Canada. Due to the high capital investment and energy requirement for surface upgrading downhole upgrading of heavy oil has been proposed.(3), (4), (5) Down-hole upgrading makes it possible to recover and upgrade immense heavy oil resources without using large volumes of water, burning natural gas, or emitting greenhouse gases. In situ upgrading of heavy oil and bitumen has been reported both in field scale operations and in laboratory scale experiments.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».