Stimulation Effectiveness in Multilayered, Tight Gas Reservoirs: Pinedale Anticline Area
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This article, written by Assistant Technology Editor Karen Bybee, contains highlights of paper SPE 100574, "Using Reservoir Modeling To Evaluate Stimulation Effectiveness in Multilayered ‘Tight’ Gas Reservoirs: A Case History in The Pinedale Anticline Area," by S.K. Schubarth, SPE, Schubarth Inc.; J.P. Spivey, SPE, Phoenix Reservoir Software LLC; and P.T. Huckabee, SPE, Shell E&P Co., prepared for the 2006 SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, 15–17 May. Low-permeability, or "tight," gas reservoirs are being developed at an ever-increasing rate in the U.S. Currently, there are several tight gas plays in the U.S. where multiple intervals are commingled for economic viability. The Pinedale anticline completions pose a complex problem in determining the best stimulation method because as many as 22 separate stimulation treatments are placed in as many as 70 discrete sands over a 6,000-ft-thick interval. Evaluation is complicated by permeability variations that exceed two orders of magnitude and pore-pressure gradients that range from 0.22 to 0.83 psi/ft. Introduction Development of the Pinedale anticline in southwestern Wyoming has continued at an aggressive pace over the past several years. Massive hydraulic-fracturing (MHF) treatments are the only way to stimulate production from the tight gas sands present in this area to economically acceptable levels. Generally, each well requires between 14 and 22 MHF treatments to produce effectively from all potential pay intervals. Often, more than 2 million lbm of proppant is used per well, representing a high investment cost to the operator. The ability to evaluate the incremental production associated with the use of one proppant vs. another can have a significant effect on field profitability. Data Analysis Production and completion information from 11 wells with 172 fracture-treated intervals was included in this analysis. Production information was updated, and all 11 wells have at least two production logs, with one early in the well life. A detailed production history also was available for all wells for use in the reservoir-simulation evaluation. Six different proppants were used in the fracture treatments pumped. Reservoir Simulation. For single-layer tight gas reservoirs, fracture and reservoir properties usually are estimated by analyzing production data. Methods for such single-layer analysis include advanced decline-curve analysis with constant-terminal-pressure type curves, type-curve matching with constant-terminal-rate type curves, and automatic history matching with a single-layer analytical reservoir simulator. Single-layer analysis methods may provide estimates of in-situ permeability to gas, fracture half-length, fracture conductivity, and drainage area, which are used in evaluating the success of a fracture treatment, selecting restimulation candidates, optimizing future fracture treatments, forecasting future performance, and estimating reserves.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».