Standard and Multifrequency Tympanometric Norms for Caucasian and Chinese Young Adults
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Brief Objective: This study examined differences between a group of normal-hearing Caucasian and Chinese young adults on six tympanometric parameters. The goal of this study was to determine if the Chinese group had different low and multifrequency tympanometry results than the Caucasian group. Design: There were a total of 159 subjects (303 ears) between the ages of 18 and 34 years, with 76 subjects in the Caucasian group and 83 subjects in the Chinese group. Tympanometric data were gathered on a clinical immittance machine, the Virtual 310 equipped with a high frequency option. Four of the parameters—static admittance (SA), tympanometric width (TW), tympanometric peak pressure (TPP), and ear-canal volume (ECV)—were measured automatically at a standard 226 Hz frequency. The remaining two parameters—resonant frequency (RF) and SA up to 1200 Hz—were measured by multifrequency, multicomponent tympanometry, using a mathematical approach. Results: The Chinese group had significantly lower SA, wider TW, more positive TPP, and lower ECV than their Caucasian counterparts. The parameter of SA up to 1200 Hz showed a significant group effect (Caucasian versus Chinese) until 900 Hz in the male group and up to 1120 Hz in the female group. The Chinese group had significantly higher RF than the Caucasian group. Once the effect of body size was compensated by adjusting for the ear canal and the middle ear volumes, the differences observed between the Caucasian and the Chinese groups were no longer significant for tympanometric parameters obtained at standard probe tone frequency of 226 Hz; however, the effect was still significant for SA obtained at higher probe tone frequencies (560, 630, 710, 800, and 900 Hz) and for RF. Applying the Caucasian norms to a group of mainly Caucasian adults with surgically confirmed otosclerosis resulted in improved overall test performance when compared with the combined Caucasian and Chinese norms and the Chinese only norms. Conclusions: It seems that the body size plays a crucial factor in the observed differences between the Caucasian group and Chinese groups at a standard probe tone frequency of 226 Hz; however, other mechano-acoustical properties of the middle ear may contribute to these differences at higher probe tone frequencies. Findings of this study suggest that further research is needed to investigate the effects of body size on immittance measures with other ethnic groups. In the meantime, overall test performance may be improved by using a more homogenous norm when testing the Caucasian or Chinese individuals. This paper investigates the effect of anatomical differences, especially the body size, between Caucasian and Chinese Young Adults on standard and multifrequency tympanometry. Tympanograms from individuals of different ethnic backgrounds are currently being assessed based on Caucasian norms (or norms of an unspecified origin). This paper has shown that the Chinese group had significantly different standard and multifrequency tympanometric parameters than their Caucasian counterparts. Once the effect of body size was compensated by adjusting for the ear canal and the middle ear volumes, the differences observed between the Caucasian and the Chinese groups were no longer significant at the standard probe tone frequency of 226 Hz. Applying the Caucasian norms to a group of mainly Caucasian adults with surgically confirmed otosclerosis, resulted in improved overall test performance. Overall test performance may be improved by using a more homogenous norm when testing the Caucasian or Chinese individuals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».