A Light to Lighten our Darkness: Lighthouse Optics and the Later Development of Fresnel's Revolutionary Refracting Lens 1780–1900
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper on lighthouse optics describes the background to Augustin Fresnel's concept of refracting, or dioptric, built-up glass lenses, which superseded the catoptric or reflecting system using silvered copper mirrors. Fresnel's brilliant invention revolutionized navigation and coastal lighting. The paper focuses on the period after Fresnel's death in 1827, which occurred before he had time to perfect his optical instruments. It describes the achievements of Fresnel's successors in France and Britain who were finally able to realise the full potential of the dioptric lens for both fixed and revolving lights, ranging from small harbour lanterns to the great sea lights. Léonor Fresnel, Augustin's brother, and Alan Stevenson of the Scottish lighthouse family eventually succeeded in producing the first all-glass optic. This incorporated large-scale internally reflecting or catadioptric prisms, which extended the lens action of the original dioptric lens panels and harnessed more of the light rays. Thomas Stevenson built on this work to design his “Holophote” or “Light of maximum intensity”, a new type of catadioptric lens. Thomas went on to create increasingly sophisticated instruments, such as the “Azimuthal Condensing Light”, designing new forms of prism to direct beams of light with increasing accuracy, maximizing strength and brightness and minimizing fuel consumption. Working alongside the engineers was a group of specialist manufacturers who developed the fabrication techniques to make these increasingly large and complex instruments. Particularly notable was the firm founded by François Soleil who had worked with Augustin Fresnel on the earliest lenses, while Soleil's son-in-law, François Jeune, collaborated with Léonor Fresnel and Alan Stevenson. Chance Brothers of Birmingham was the other major optic manufacturer, thanks to the achievements of James Timmins Chance, who worked closely with Thomas Stevenson to produce such useful devices as the dioptric mirror, and with Michael Faraday to transform the accurate setting and adjusting of the component parts of each optic. Chance's successor in the firm, John Hopkinson, invented “Group flashing”, which introduced further categories of distinctions by which each lighthouse could be identified. Towards the end of the nineteenth century, advances in physiology led to a greater understanding of the effect of a flashing light on the human retina. This led to a new generation of optics with higher rotational speeds made possible by the introduction of the mercury float. Scientists such as Bloch and Charpentier worked in parallel with the lighthouse engineers, notably Bourdelles, Blondel and Rey, using these new findings to design smaller but more powerful and efficient lenses, particularly suitable for electricity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle