Correspondance (1893–1934) <i> <i> A <scp>ndré</scp> G <scp>ide</scp> –P <scp>aul</scp> F <scp>ort</scp> </i> : Correspondance (1893–1934) </i> . Édition établie, présentée et annotée par A <scp>kio</scp> Y <scp>oshii</scp> . (Gide/Textes, 20). Tupin-et-Semons: Centre d'études gidiennes, 2012. 89 pp.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This volume brings together all the known letters exchanged between André Gide and Paul Fort, forty-three in total, written between 1893 and 1934. Akio Yoshii deftly guides the reader through what is, at times, a scant (though nonetheless affectionate) correspondence. Yoshii provides a level of detail that not only firmly contextualizes each letter, but also accounts for the often lengthy gaps in communication between the writers. This involves the inclusion of a number of missives sent by intermediary figures (such as Robert Fort), which elucidate certain exchanges between Gide and Fort, as well as useful references to other published and unpublished correspondences. The literary journal founded by Paul Fort, Vers et prose, was well established by the time the Nouvelle Revue française began publication. The interactions between Gide and Fort often focus on either one or both of these journals, meaning that many of their exchanges tread a line between fond admiration and literary transaction. Indeed, the uncovering of the complex relationship between the two, not only as acquaintances in the literary world, but as writers operating in key editorial roles, is one of the volume's strong points. A notable 1911 exchange sees Gide air his disappointment on being excluded from a list of sponsors circulated before a celebratory banquet in honour of Fort; this unfortunate administrative error elicited much hand-wringing on the part of the greatly embarrassed poet. Fort, in fact, was always keen to impart his gratitude to Gide for his support, collaboration, and encouragement; nowhere is this shown more clearly than in a particularly moving letter from 1914, in which Fort (elected ‘Prince des poètes’ in 1912) also makes the case for poetry in a time of war. Gide's opinion of Fort's work was less favourable by the interwar period, and their correspondence, fizzling out as it does, is a poignant testament to a fading friendship. A number of private sales over the years have seen several of Gide's letters to Fort dispersed, often irretrievably; in such instances, Yoshii is forced to resort to the relevant sales catalogue entry to ensure as seamless a transition as possible from one letter to the next. This is an unfortunate but unavoidable challenge faced by scholars working on the correspondence of those writers, Gide included, whose fame and seniority as major literary figures had, in earlier times, secured a wide private market for their letters. Yoshii's scholarship, especially in surmounting the various obstacles that the incomplete Gide–Fort correspondence presents, constitutes a valuable addition to Gide's extensive correspondence already in print, and will be of particular interest to those focusing on his early works. As much as it reveals Fort's engagement with one of his most illustrious contributors, the volume also gives us remarkable insight into this under-esteemed poet, highlighting his unwavering appreciation of the power of lyrical inspiration, and the ways in which this outlook informs his editorial role.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,032 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,010 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,010 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,011 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».