MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2017226528 · doi:10.1353/cjm.2007.0003

Chaucer’s Queer Poetics. Rereading the Dream Trio by Susan Schibanoff (review)

2007· article· en· W2017226528 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin Teo

Notice bibliographique

RevueComitatus · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Studies of British Isles
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésParadiseAnachronismPoeticsLiteratureDreamOrder (exchange)Theme (computing)ArtWhite (mutation)DisappointmentArt historyHistoryPhilosophyPoetryPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

REVIEWS 271 than revolutions in science and exploration as the primary cause of Eden’s gradual disappearance from mappae mundi. These arguments will be familiar to readers of Scafi’s 1999 essay, “Mapping Eden: Cartographies of the Earthly Paradise,” in the edited volume Mappings. Those who were tantalized by the earlier work will find reasons for delight and disappointment in this extended treatment of the same topic. Chief among the delights are the illustrations. The medieval mappae mundi that Scafi examines are reproduced in glorious color plates in the center of the book. Large blackand -white versions, printed with exceptional clarity, appear throughout the chapters. Valuable diagrams accompany over forty of these maps and render them accessible to contemporary Anglophone scholars. Another great strength of the book is that medieval conceptual frameworks, rather than anachronistic categories, dictate the parameters of the discussion. Scafi’s analysis of mappae mundi conforms to medieval criteria for this genre rather than modern expectations of what constitutes an accurate world map. In order to distinguish between the spatial and temporal aspects of the world, Scafi embraces Hugh of St. Victor’s twelfth-century terms—mundis and saeculum —rather than importing Newtonian theoretical categories. Scafi’s commitment to probing medieval theology and cartography on their own terms extends beyond word choice to the very core of his project. The major disappointment is that the book’s encyclopedic scope forestalls deeper investigation into key issues. Scafi surveys the entire Christian history of paradise, from its biblical origins to its manifestations in twenty-first century art installations and travel posters. This diachronic format forces Scafi to abandon some of his most compelling ideas prematurely in order to rush off to the next era. As a result of his single-minded focus on the theological background of mapping paradise, Scafi marginalizes overlapping poetic and scientific factors . Passing references to Dante and Milton are superficial and unsatisfying. Scafi’s claims that the era of exploration was of limited relevance to changing perception of Eden are unconvincing. A minor but nagging difficulty is Scafi’s use of the phrase “Judeo-Christian ,” which appears inconsistently and without explanation. Since Scafi makes no mention of Jewish religious or philosophical literature and, in fact, the Garden of Eden created different challenges for medieval Jewish and Christian exegetes, this term is quite misleading. These deficiencies notwithstanding, Mapping Paradise is an achievement worth celebrating. Scafi has identified a fascinating area of Christian intellectual history and indicated countless avenues for advanced research. He accepts the convention of examining theological discourse and artistic materials sideby -side, and ingeniously reframes the discussion to include mappae mundi as visual theology. This book is a provocative and productive contribution to scholarship on Christian thought and material culture in all periods. JESSICA ANDRUSS, Near Eastern Languages and Cultures The Ohio State University Susan Schibanoff, Chaucer’s Queer Poetics. Rereading the Dream Trio (Toronto : University of Toronto Press 2006) 365 pp. REVIEWS 272 The academic field of medieval authorship and authority encountered one of its first few seminal works in the 1980s with Alastair J. Minnis’s Medieval Theory of Authorship, which posited that the medieval auctore (author or figure of authority) fashioned his authorial identity as one who both “ties” his work to a classical-literary past, as well as one who “performs” his work as one distinct from it. These two praxes of Minnis’s medieval theory of authorship, heritage, and re-creation, have come to characterize authorship studies in the medieval period despite the onslaught of new critical practices. In Chaucer’s Queer Poetics , Susan Schibanoff obliquely pays tribute to Minnis’s influential theoretical paradigm, teasing out the ideological implications of Chaucer’s literary career and development throughout the trajectory of the dream trio of visionary poems, The Book of the Duchess, The House of Fame, and The Parliament of Fowls, in their corroborations of French and Italian influence, revealing how Chaucer the poet was immensely indebted to tradition as much as he sought to re-perform it. Her study of the dream trio is encyclopedic in approach, encompassing the voices of critics and scholars long “canonized” in the field of Chaucer studies such as Minnis, Charles Muscatine, and Wolfgang...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,045

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0040,006
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueComitatusMême sujetHistorical Studies of British IslesTravaux en français237 207