Synthesis and Characterization of Neutral and Cationic Platinum(II) Complexes Featuring Pincer-like Bis(phosphino)silyl Ligands: Si−H and Si−Cl Bond Activation Chemistry
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The synthesis and characterization of a new series of Pt(II) complexes bearing the tridentate bis(phosphino)silyl ligands [κ 3 -(2-R 2 P C 6 H 4 ) 2 Si Me] − ([R-PSiP], R = Ph, Cy) are reported. The tertiary silane [Ph-PSiP]H reacted with PtCl 2 (SEt 2 ) 2 to afford [Ph-PSiP]PtCl ( 1 ), which was structurally characterized. Alkyl derivatives of 1 were prepared in high yields by the reaction of 1 with either PhCH 2 K to afford [Ph-PSiP]PtCH 2 Ph ( 2 ) or MeLi to afford [Ph-PSiP]PtMe ( 3 ). The X-ray crystal structure of 2·CH 2 Cl 2 was obtained and confirmed a square-planar geometry about Pt, with the benzyl ligand positioned trans to Si. Treatment of either 2 or 3 with 1 equiv of B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 in benzene solution led to the formation of the corresponding cationic species {[Ph-PSiP]Pt} + [RB(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] − (R = CH 2 Ph, 4; R = Me, 5 ). X-ray quality crystals of 4(OEt 2 )·OEt 2 were grown from an Et 2 O solution of 4; the crystal structure of 4(OEt 2 )·OEt 2 features an Et 2 O molecule coordinated to the cationic Pt center, resulting in square-planar coordination geometry at Pt. Both 4 and 5 underwent a subsequent reaction to generate [Ph-PSiP]Pt(C 6 F 5 ) ( 6 ). Treatment of 1 with 1 equiv of Li[B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ](OEt 2 ) 2.5 in fluorobenzene afforded {[Ph-PSiP]Pt(OEt 2 )} + [B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] − ( 7(OEt 2 ) ). Although the reaction of 1 with AlCl 3 led to a mixture of products, crystallization attempts enabled the isolation of a minute quantity of fluorobenzene-solvated [Ph-PSiP]PtCl·AlCl 3 ( 1(AlCl 3 )·(C 6 H 5 F) 2 ), which was crystallographically characterized and features a chloride ligand bridging the Pt and Al centers. The dicyclohexylphosphino derivative [Cy-PSiP]H reacted with PtCl 2 (SEt 2 ) 2 in the presence of Et 3 N to afford [Cy-PSiP]PtCl ( 8 ), which reacted with AgOTf to form [Cy-PSiP]PtOTf ( 9 ). Heating of either 8 or 9 for extended periods in benzene solution in the presence of amine bases did not result in benzene activation. Treatment of 8 with RLi reagents (R = Me, Ph) afforded the corresponding methyl ([Cy-PSiP]PtMe, 10 ) and phenyl ([Cy-PSiP]PtPh, 11 ) complexes, the latter of which was crystallographically characterized. As was observed for 3, compound 10 reacted with 1 equiv of B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 to form {[Cy-PSiP]Pt} + [MeB(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ] − ( 12 ), which upon heating in benzene afforded [Cy-PSiP]Pt(C 6 F 5 ) ( 13 ) with loss of MeB(C 6 F 5 ) 2 . Treatment of 8 with LiEt 3 BH led to the formation of [Cy-P Si (μ-H)P] Pt ( 14 ), which was identified on the basis of NMR and IR spectroscopic data as a bis(phosphino) Pt derivative of [Cy-PSiP]H that features η 2 -Si-H coordination involving the tethered silicon fragment. Although complexes 2, 3, and 10 did not react with an atmosphere of H 2, these compounds reacted readily with 1 equiv of PhSiH 3 to form the corresponding silyl complexes ([Ph-PSiP]PtSiH 2 Ph, 15; [Cy-PSiP]PtSiH 2 Ph, 16 ) upon loss of toluene or methane, respectively. While 2 and 3 also reacted with 1 equiv of Ph 2 SiHCl to form the silyl complex [Ph-PSiP]PtSiPh 2 Cl ( 17 ), 10 reacted with either Ph 2 SiHCl or i Pr 2 SiHCl to form [Cy-PSiP]PtCl ( 8 ). Complex 10 also reacted with 1 equiv of Me 3 SiCl to form 8 and Me 4 Si upon heating. Although complex 11 also reacted with hydridochlorosilanes to form 8, these reactions were significantly slower relative to 10 . In contrast to 10 and 11, the η 2 -Si-H complex 14 reacted with 1 equiv of either PhSiH 3 or Ph 2 SiHCl to form the corresponding Pt silyl complexes 16 and [Cy-PSiP]PtSiPh 2 Cl ( 18 ), with loss of H 2 .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».