MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2018201295 · doi:10.1177/1715163513494591

What is patient-centred care? / Que sont les soins axés sur le patient?

2013· article· fr· W2018201295 sur OpenAlexaffvenue
Ross T. Tsuyuki, Ines Krass

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2013
Typearticle
Languefr
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBlueprintPharmacistHealth careMedicineNursingMedical prescriptionPharmacyPolitical scienceArtVisual arts

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Case Study: Mr. S is a 56-year-old long-time patient of yours. He has type 2 diabetes and hypertension. He comes for refills of his metformin and perindopril, which he ordered online after receiving an automated refill reminder on his smartphone. He takes a seat in your newly renovated lounge area (with plants and leather sofas) and helps himself to an ethically sourced espresso coffee. Mmmmmm! He catches your eye and says, “I heard you won an award from Canuck Pharmacist Magazine for patient-centred care. Congratulations!” “Thanks,” you say as you hand him his prescriptions. “It’s folks like you that make it all worthwhile. Do you have your JumboPoints card? It’s double points day today.” You turn to your student. “Now that is what patient-centred care is all about. It’s the blueprint for our future. . . .” You know it by heart: The vision of the Blueprint for Pharmacy: “Optimal drug therapy outcomes for Canadians through patient-centred care.”1 It’s our mantra. But is the pharmacist in this case practising patient-centred care? Certainly, the surrounds are plush and the exchange is pleasant, but is this patient-centred care? Resoundingly, no. So, if a leafy-leather-espresso-lounge (with loyalty points) is not patient-centred care, then exactly what is? If we look to the Blueprint, it defines patient-centred care as “the merging of several models of health care practice including patient education, self-care and evidence-based care into 4 broad areas of intervention: communication with patients, partnership with patients, health promotion and delivery of care.”1 Not very helpful. We need a more explicit definition of patient-centred care; otherwise, we run the risk of misinterpreting the Blueprint, as in the example above. Since patient care is many different things, we propose a set of principles of patient-centred care (modelled after Epstein and Street2): It is a professional obligation to take responsibility for, and provide care targeted to, the individual patient’s needs. It involves: Respect: A deep sense of respect for the individual patient Listening to and understanding what patients want, their values, their treatment goals, the context and environment in which they are living Informing: Providing patients with unbiased and context-specific information Empowering patients to actively participate in decision making regarding their health Assisting patients in setting achievable goals with enabling strategies to improve their health outcomes Providing continuity of care to regularly review patients’ progress in meeting their health goals So, patient-centred care is defined by the patient but fulfilled by the practitioner. As stated by Leslee Thompson, president and CEO of Kingston General Hospital, “At the heart of patient-centred care is a commitment to working with patients as partners, which is a shift from a ‘doing to and doing for’ approach to patient care to a ‘doing with’ approach.”3 For pharmacists, that should mean practising to their full scope to meet the patient’s needs. It means taking responsibility. It means listening to, understanding and advocating for all of your patients. It is also important to define what is not patient-centred care: Needs/desires/aversions of the practitioner Getting credit Getting paid Status Turf Market share Superficial consumer marketing As such, pharmacists must put aside their insecurities about patient and physician acceptance of their care and patient advocacy and take responsibility for their duty of care. Now back to our case study: Upon seeing Mr. S, you check his blood pressure (which is 152/96 mmHg) and inquire about his last hemoglobin A1c (which was 9.5%). You discuss your concerns about his cardiovascular risk with him, as well as his desired outcomes and challenges. He states that his physician is “happy with his blood pressure,” but he is fearful of having a stroke. You offer to discuss these matters with his family physician and ask him to come back in 2 weeks to check his blood pressure again. Pharmacy needs to deliver patient-centred care as much as patients need it. Remember, most of us chose pharmacy as a profession because we wanted to care for patients. What we have going for us is that we are highly accessible, approachable, and respected; are good communicators; and have a strong desire to please. Patient-centred care truly is our future and we must get it right. In this article, we have offered some principles of patient-centred care. Many of you already practise with this philosophy in mind. We invite you write to us with your comments and examples so we can add to this list. Let’s support each other in this journey. ■

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,036

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,022
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,005
Communication savante0,0060,010
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,149
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,186 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2013
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du CanadaMême sujetPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareTravaux en français237 207